LOTR Animated vs LOTR

(385 votes, average 4.82 out of 5)

Check out our weekly custom image creator Marobot's DeviantArt Profile here
Comments (623)
  • mvdnc121  - Cool
    avatar

    Yeah great review :lol:

  • RuinerXXSinCity  - Am I the only one?
    avatar

    Look I know no matter how lightly I step with this comment I am still going to get backlash from people who feel it is necessary to agree with Doug on every tiny detail. I love NC to death, but for the first time I can't deny that my own opinions differ greatly.

    I won't sit here and nit-pick, but just throw a few of my major differences of ideas. I understand this review leveled the playing ground by keeping ROTK on the sideline, but still Aragorn shows as much kingly potential in PJ's version as possible without turning the film's focus completely on him. The thing is in the PJ films his leadership qualities are downplayed, and subtle to help keep Aragorn from looking like an arrogant dick. Which is much more the impression I got from the animated film.

    Yes John Hurt is a legend, and can play a huge variety of characters. It wouldn't be fair to sell his take on Aragorn short, but due to the low budget of the animated film it is hard to take him seriously. In the 70's version Aragorn seems a bit like a tyrant demanding loyalty, where the modern Aragorn has more of a leadership aura which earns loyalty. I think the perfect example is at the battle of Helm's Deep where he convinces King Théoden to ride out face their enemies presumably to the death, and leave the safety of the barricaded area.

  • Crystal6  - Hm...
    avatar

    10 positive.
    1 negative.

    I'd say... you're not the only one. (I agree with you as well and was going silently insane at that part of the video.) Not that my opinion means anything. :unsure:

  • SirSick  - as long as the cats are on fire ...
    avatar

    To Be Honest, I have always loved Peter Jackson `s approach to making LoTR. Though some people would call it 'loving the subject so much he would take it in his a**' (yathzee), it remains ever convincing, as he dedicates so much time to the build up of every scene and character. Even though Bashki did some nice things as well ... the fact his version was animated annoyed me to the highest degree.To me personally, real people are better at showing their emotions better than animations and a longer story is always better. As Jackson `s characters get more time to evolve, they also have more chances to endeer themselves to us.

    The only sad thing was the fact that he did n´t have enough time to tell more of the story. Probably due to bugetary reasons. Kinda sad really, because if it was doable ... a BBC miniseries style of 12 episodes would do the 3 books more justice as he would have more time to add more weight to each scene as slowly and as precisely as he pleased.

    Then, I would probably just die from watching the sheer awesome that would be .. my dream film O_o

  • ThatGuyNamedCanopenerdude
    avatar

    while i agree that real people work very well here, I think in essence animation suits LOTR better because it's simply so far out. I think if Pixar made LoTR, it would be solid gold win XD

  • ChromeBallz
    avatar

    Completely agree (wow, late reply).

    Aragorn's entire storyline is about how he is one of the Dunedain Rangers - He knows about his heritage but he doesn't feel he's up to the task. His entire character is built around *not* being a king untill the responsibility is thrust upon him, and i would say that the Jackson version is far superior.

  • Henky
    avatar

    How awesome is it not that Anthony "C-3PO" Daniels is voicing Legolas? :P

  • JohanTW
    avatar

    What about Legolas...?

  • UberCream  - ...
    avatar

    LAST!

  • Coldguy
    avatar

    :confused: I thought both were bad....oh well.

  • RebelTaxi
    avatar

    Hey, Coldguy, you already pissed off the Harry Potter fans. Don't insult another movie based on a book. Save it for Twilight 2.

  • jorneydo
    avatar

    I guess we should conclude that coldguy dislikes movies based on books.

    Hey great video, I never know of that animated one

  • TheAtomic
    avatar

    Site Wide Nerd Rage Fueled Ranting War in 3...2...

  • Dead Planet  - Good timing! ;)
    avatar

    Not site wide, but hey... close enough.

  • Lodeman AKA LARUCUS
    avatar

    hey, if u dont like movie based off of books then why are you bothering with this you hate??? seriously... hypocritical asshole, sure u can comment on the video, its a free country, but you dont have to flame on it and piss of people who enjoy it, so just to the tgwtg community and stop it!! and yeah i agree with rebeltaxi, save it for something that deserves complaining about...

  • drunkonsprite  - poor you
    avatar

    why is it theres always someone on these videos that leaves a comment and then theyre spat on...maybe theyre th fanboys

  • powermad9
    avatar

    I never exactly liked them, but these movies are pretty cool.

  • 12shots

    wooo!

  • Naxotahnj
    avatar

    Well done sir.

  • Gillos  - EPIC!
    avatar

    B) "Long time watcher, first time poster"

    :0 "Epic video, I really enjoy these Old vs New ones."

  • darkpice
    avatar

    good vid as always. well worth the wait.

  • coconut
    avatar

    i know! when i first saw he was doing this I watched both of them again so I can decide for myself. it's still a toss up though. I appreciate both just as much.

    03:39 thats me at my last job. :s

  • Strawberry Eggs
    avatar

    Ah, so that's the animated Lord of the RIngs movie. Haven't seen it myself, but I can see why you thought the Jackson films were better over all.

    Interesting how Frodo's character is closer to the original books in the animated film rather than Jackson ones. I began reading the original books (I only have Return of the King left to read), and I was surprised on how much Frodo was changed.

    Oh and the part where you're doing Smeagol and Gollum arguing over whether "they're" going to have diet coke or regular coke nearly had me on the floor laughing.

    Excellent job, Critic!

  • Timic83
    avatar

    youtube version here!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3TqpB6snuc

  • Jacob9k1
    avatar
    Timic83 wrote:
    youtube version here!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3TqpB6snuc


    ^
    |
    Thumb it down and don't fall for it.

  • Digger318
    avatar

    wooo also 1st time poster!!! cant believe im posting early, in any case... keep them ace vids coming!!!

  • The0ptimus
    avatar

    lol 1: 06 great one NC. I personally didn't like the animated lord of the ring movie (while i liked the hobbit one). I think the live action movies are alot better.

  • rangerdude  - woooo
    avatar

    Good review Doug
    as always :lol:

  • Ranveer
    avatar

    Another great video NC.

  • ossemon
    avatar

    Very good review :D - To bad the animated film sucked...

  • Aufbruch
    avatar

    Wow. I was actually expecting you to bash the Bakshi version from beginning to end like everyone else...

    Jackson version wins in an overall comparison, but people like to turn a blind eye to the fact that Bakshi did a handful of things better, and that Jackson has admitted to lifting a good amount of his ideas directly from Bakshi.

    And THANK YOU for pointing out that Bakshi's villains are far more intimidating.

    Edit: Little tidbit I manage to dig up today: Bakshi's film was actually a box office success. 30.5 million on a budget of 4 million(remember, 1970s). The second was never made because of all the meddling he had to put up with from the studio and his producers, none of whom had any respect for the books.

  • NOTYETUSEDNAME  - With respect....
    avatar

    I saw Bashki's film in the theater when it came out. I agree with you that his version of the villains are, for the most part, more intimidating with one big exception: The Balrog at the bridge of Kazadum. Bashki's version does look evil and menacing, but Jackson's is bad-assed lethal and terrifying. When Gandalf stands up to it is one of cinema's great on the edge of your seat moments. I actually was disappointed that Bashki didn't get a chance to finish the series and do Return of The King. Oh well....I am gratified that Peter Jackson did his films with obvious passion and respect for the source material. I'm also glad I saw both versions on the big screen. Peace.

  • NOTYETUSEDNAME
    avatar

    I always knew you were brilliant, Doug, but your unashamed needling of President Obama in the middle of your review, elevates my respect for you about a thousand times. I pray that the current administration's attempts to dismantle the United States Constitution fail miserably. If anything he does censors your website, I would weep for the loss of American freedom and the daily laughs I enjoy from you, and your very talented companions on TGWTG.com. Keep up the great work.-America needs you far more than they need the Government. Peace.

  • adrasl300
    avatar

    Pfft!
    Have you ever lived in a social democracy?
    I didnt think soo!
    But let me tell you....its pretty damn good
    except maybe for all the immigration from third world countries.
    Not that I have anything against immigrants as people but they tend to make a mess.
    And your talk of "American freedom" is utterly pointless since I have about the same freedom as you(except I can walk about everywhere without getting shot by some frickin hillbilly).
    And if anything we censor less.

  • adrasl300
    avatar

    I mean seriously do you folks live in a bubble!
    You seem to think that america is politically at the forefront of the whole civilized world.

    "Ohh a progressive slightly left wing politician is in office!
    Will this mean a new soviet!?"

    Uhh....yeah have you ever heard of that strange mythical continent to the east called "Europe"?

    Because from where I come from Obama isnt really that big of a deal.

  • blacktrojan3921
    avatar

    Uhm dude, just because he made big joke on President Obama doesn't mean he's against him =/. Alot of people joked about Obama's presidency including his reliance on the teleprompter, and his stimulus bill, but that doesn't mean we're against him; it just means we see him as any normal president who is doing his job to make sure America runs smoothly and makes the countrya world leader and a well liked one.

    No offense, but that is bit reduntant to say that; considering that he's just doing his job to make America a better place for everyone, while some of you guys who's political beliefs are the complete opposite of his beliefs make claims his actions are destroying America. That isn't political bravery, that's political paranoia, and it's very common for people who are deeply involved in politics, whether they're politician voters who are against someone and claims such radical things but don't have concrete proof to back it up.

  • SickBritKid
    avatar

    Yeah, Bakshi's versions are WAY more intimidating.

    The Black Cheerleaders of Moria are DEFINITELY better than the undead wraths of Moria.

    The Dark Lord Who Says Ni is WAY more awesome than the powerhouse armor-clad warrior of the Jackson version.

    Better yet, there is NOTHING, and I mean NOTHING that can stand up to the robe-clad, lion-head wearing Balrog with butterfly wings and carpet slippers...

    You're right, the Bakshi version's cheap-ass villains were SO MUCH MORE FUCKIN' AWESOME than the well-crafted ones of Jackson...

    /sarcasm

  • Oceanic815
    avatar

    New all the way!

  • Deimos1984rd  - Thare was a Rankin Bass version????
    avatar

    I enjoy these old vs new videos a lot, thanks.

  • joshlama
    avatar

    Yep, I Jackson worked best.

  • Animikean
    avatar

    NC, I hate to mention it, but on the title card you've got 4 digits on your right hand but 5 digits on the left.

  • Cross  - re:
    avatar
    Animikean wrote:
    NC, I hate to mention it, but on the title card you've got 4 digits on your right hand but 5 digits on the left.

    There's 4 digits on the left as well.

  • aragorn
    avatar

    Maybe goullum bit it off!
    He did that to Frodo if you didn't watch the movies.

  • Chosen Zelos
    avatar

    Wonderful compare and contrast, as always.

    Really takes me back. The cartoon films were pretty ok ... some of their animation and "action scenes" don't look like they withstood the test of time, but that can be overlooked every once in a while.

  • Jaws900
    avatar

    It was no suprise that Jackson won but was a suprise was that the other one got 2 points.
    Jackson's LOTR is one of the best movies of all time and will forever be up there with Star Wars etc. The Baski film is forgotten for a reason.

  • Downup
    avatar

    Never saw the animated version.. And i will never see it :D :evil:

  • GlaciusX2
    avatar

    haha Love your Golum impression xD
    Nice review

  • doctorglove  - LOL
    avatar

    The ending was hilarious.
    I agree with NC's view completely.
    Man I feel old for watching both the animated and the new one.

    Oh by the way: Am I the only one that loved the "where there's a whip" song?

  • Witney  - You're not the only one.
    avatar

    I adored that song as a child, and would sing it to my family. To this day, my mother can sing it as a duel with me.

  • shaolindave  - jackson wins
    avatar

    haha, i was wondering if you were going to fully review the animated 'return of the king'. thank you for sparing us. we hates it.

  • ShadowST78  - Wow
    avatar

    I REALLY need to pull out those old VHS tapes and watch the old Baski films. Only one I dont own is the Return of the King (For a damn reason too). Anyways, Good review overall. While I do agree about Sauron in a way you cant forget most of the villians in Jacksons film. What really took me was of course Sarumon.

  • Euphonium
    avatar

    "Aw sword mean..." I remember first seeing the old versions when I was seven thinking, "What is this?" Great as always.

  • Drekt  - Aruman
    avatar

    Funny that he mentioned the "Aruman" issue. My understanding is that there was some concern that people who hadn't read the books would confuse Saruman and Sauron. As such, Saruman became Aruman.

  • aragorn
    avatar

    And they were just too lazy to edit the part where Saruman tried to talk Gandalf into giving the location of the ring away?

  • SickBritKid
    avatar

    Yes, because somehow SORE-ON could be confused with Saruman....

    *facepalm*

Only registered users can write comments!

Latest Videos

NC: Animaniacs Tribute Commentary

Watch Video

Spoony: Final Fantasy X ep 3

Watch Video

FB: BMB - D-War (Dragon Wars)

Watch Video

Brad: Dragon Live Again

Watch Video

JW: Ludus Review DS/Wii

Watch Video

TVTV: Season 1 Episode 13

Watch Video

Nchick: Nella Special

Watch Video

AJ: Reviews - Kane & Lynch 2

Watch Video

Ed: Press Start Episode 35

Watch Video

Phelous: Incubus

Watch Video

MikeJ: A Brief History of TV

Watch Video

NC: Rocky IV

Watch Video

Sage: FFT - Vampires Stalker II

Watch Video

GH: Donkey Kong Country VHS

Watch Video

LAG: Top 11 Comic Mis-Fires

Watch Video

Dena: LP - Silent Hill 2

Watch Video

Guru: WWF Wrestlefest

Watch Video

AT4W: Action Comic #593

Watch Video

Ben: SF X Tekken Highlights Event

Watch Video

Paw: LP - Alice 10 FINALE!

Watch Video

Brad Tries Durian Toffee

Watch Video

Spinebreakers: Ep 13 Adventure Ho!

Watch Video

EPU: Mortal Kombat Observations 2

Watch Video