Top 11 Dumbest Superman Moments
Wednesday, 15 April 2009 00:08
Check out Marobot's DeviantArt Profile here
-
04.14.2009 - 20:13 | CR!
-
04.14.2009 - 20:24 | CR!
-
08.13.2010 - 15:49 | EliteKitty
-

When I saw you were going to make fun of Superman doug I decided I WOULD DESTROY YOU when we meet, but after time and watching the video, I agree with pretty much everything you said.
How ever I will now Defend Superman and make you look like a Fool. Sorta.
11. Agreed, but It didnt bother me at all.
10. Hahaha, yea that kid was a retard - but all kid are - I used to do that same game (but not on ledges)
9. Hhaha, that was bad ass when he took that bia over the ledge, he's a pimp.
8. They need to be dumb.
7. This was due to the dwindling budget for each film following the good ones.
6. Dont question the glasses. At one point it was explained that superman actually has mind powers that convinces everyone when he wears glasses he looks completely different.
5. You think this was weird? You need to the scenes of Nuclear Man One that was cut. That's right this guy in the movie was actually Nuclear Man Two!
4. This was a creative control battle between the producers and the director. This was the wrong direction one side wanted to take that made it on screen. They wanted to make superman more like the campy batman original series.
3. HAHAHHAHAHHAHA! Greatest reference parody in superman history!
2. Superman 3 did not exist. Except for the end where Superman Fights Dark Superman.
1. NO, NO NO. I hate you. Dont destroy this for me. This is the coolest Power Ever (it works I swear - I tried it)and I hate you so bad. Your just jealous!
Fanboy Defense Complete.P.S. At least superman doesnt wear makeup or something, Doug looks odd in this one. Did anyone else notice doug seemed to be wearing make up?
-

About 3: Richard Pryor.
IMO, It had everything to do with the Casting. When I first Saw the movie (especially on the part where Lex Luthor said to him as 'The Man Who Killed Superman), I enjoyed it. What was pretty unusual was why Was Pryor casted in the movie.
Anyways, I have nothing bad to say about Pryor because he is a great comedian in many other movies with the exception of Superman 3.
BTW, Doug (Nostalgia Critic) Does look like he's wearing eyeshadow.
-
04.15.2009 - 11:01 | dallasbrown
-
04.19.2009 - 08:01 | qmattp
-
04.24.2009 - 04:31 | adrasl300
-
05.18.2009 - 04:59 | CasualVideoGamer
-
09.28.2009 - 06:53 | Krav1nov

"6. Dont question the glasses. At one point it was explained that superman actually has mind powers that convinces everyone when he wears glasses he looks completely different."
Oh yes, the old "superhypnosis" excuse. It doesn't hold water. Think about it, that would explain why nobody figures it out when looking at him in person, but how come nobody sees through it when looking at photographs of him? Does the hypnosis preemptively mind-wipe people without him ever needing to be there?
-
12.02.2009 - 12:30 | Reviewer

That defense is pretty much pure fail. If your defense is that it was supposed to be dumb and refusal to admit the points are dumb than you're just an idiot.
No spinning the Earth backwards doesn't rewind time, the glasses are pointless, and most kids are not retards. You even piss on your own feet by saying "i used to do the same thing, but not on ledges". That's the fucking point moron!
I don't mind Superman, but these movies were retarded. And so are you fanboy.
-
04.15.2009 - 06:10 | kairi4evur
-
04.15.2009 - 12:29 | Lotus Prince
-
04.28.2009 - 11:09 | Bryguy87

The sephirots are back to take over the globe and punish the people who deserve to die afther what they have done to this planet and miss used the devils power and killed beings and coverd up ufos and stole alien technology. they are going to burn 4 all eternety. the gods have sendt them to make justice to this world
and kill the goverment who made the human race a slave
-
04.14.2009 - 20:18 | WorstCaseSenerio
-
04.14.2009 - 20:19 | Stevie
-
04.14.2009 - 20:20 | Psykosis
-
04.14.2009 - 20:28 | mlsterben
-
04.15.2009 - 10:53 | mochaloca85
-

According to Einstein's theory of relativity, if one was to travel the speed of light around the earth they would move forward in time thus stopping in the future. Therefore in theory if one was to move in the opposite direction of the earth's rotation then they should be able to travel to the past... right?
-
04.14.2009 - 20:32 | CR!
-

I know it's easy to throw in big words but what you said is completly incorrect... Einstein's Theory of General Relativity describes the Equivalence Principle under wich the states of accelerated motion and being at rest in a gravitational field are physically identical. The concept of time travel is found in Quantum Physics and has nothing to do with the Earth's rotation nor Einstein.
-
04.17.2009 - 08:55 | Grandy
-
04.14.2009 - 20:32 | Figgy
-
04.14.2009 - 20:33 | SpazzMaster
-
04.14.2009 - 20:34 | CR!
-
04.14.2009 - 20:33 | beyrob
-

In the Richard Donner cut of Superman 2 they took one of your worst moments (the memory-erasing kiss) and replaced it with a reuse of the #1 stupidest moment-yeah he spins the Earth backwards a second time to erase her memory-which, oddly enough actually seems to make more sense-even if it's offset by the stupidity of the turning the Earth backwards reversing time and the fact that it's using the EXACT SAME plot device from the first film.
-
04.14.2009 - 20:59 | CMWaters
-
06.21.2009 - 21:49 | NOTYETUSEDNAME

Actually, believe it or not, Richard Donner had intended the stories of Superman and Superman II to be in one movie where spinning the Earth backward would've only been used only once at the very end. When it became obvious they couldn't cram that much story into 1 movie, they used it in the first movie, not knowing if it would be successful or not. Then, when it was, they had to find another ending to the conflict in the second movie. Had they done it Donner's way, then the time-travel paradox wouldn't have existed.
-
04.14.2009 - 20:35 | The Endless Void
-

I only saw Superman 1 and 2, not the other ones in the history. And I do remember that little bastard at Niagra Falls...I was about 14-15 at the time and I still wanted to beat this kid and his mother!!! Also, Richard Pryor is a comic god...it's so sad he was in a movie like this....Great job as always critic!!!! Can't wait for the next review! :D
-
04.14.2009 - 20:35 | joshlama
-
04.14.2009 - 20:35 | TheGirlWithTheFedora
-
04.14.2009 - 20:35 | WhiteWolf
-
04.14.2009 - 20:36 | Star_Sage
-
04.14.2009 - 20:37 | iamnotincompliance

5: If he could fly fast enough to send the entire planet back in time, he could fly fast enough to, oh, I don't know, travel back in time on his own, which would be far easier?
-
On that note, I loved Pinky and the Brain coming out of nowhere and having just exactly the scene you needed.
-
Also, how the hell does Lois fly if he's only holding on to one arm, if that? Is he somehow generating enough lift for the both of them? If so, why the hell hasn't her arm ripped straight from the socket?
-
And while I'm ranting, isn't there one movie where he fixes a wall just by looking at it, displaying some form of telekinesis that was never before established and never seen since?
Okay, rant over, excellent video, but I had no reason to expect otherwise.
-
04.14.2009 - 20:37 | midnightmoon13
-
04.14.2009 - 20:40 | Ashariel
-
04.14.2009 - 20:54 | CMWaters
-
04.18.2009 - 17:26 | Bryguy87
-
04.14.2009 - 20:38 | LUrabbi
-
04.14.2009 - 20:40 | CMWaters

The glasses...oh how many people have argued it.
It's not JUST the glasses from some of the better arguments.
1)It's the mannerisms
2)It's the fact that no one in that universe can even PICTURE Superman having a secret identity, so they don't try to put 2 & 2 together. They might note they look similar...but never stop to think they'd be the same.
-

The "Earth Spinning Backwards" was just a visual.
All he did was time travel.
Reason he never did something like that before was Jor-El's speech:
"It is FORBIDDEN to interfere with human affairs."
Also, the time travel was actually suppossed to be for Superman II (as you'll see in the Donner cut of Superman II). It was put in for the first movie because the ending wasn't dramatic enough.
Director's commentaries are your friend.
-
07.21.2010 - 17:07 | rattlehead91

That's all great, but it still doesn't make sense. How does he time travel? Film is a visual medium and if you show Superman as flying so fast the earth spins backwards as the reason for time reversing than that is what the movie is telling you. The scenes from the movie show things unbreaking (i.e. the dam) without the aid of Superman. Whether or not the director says it in the commentary is irrelevant - it's how it is portrayed on film and quite frankly it doesn't make any sense, even for a super hero movie.
-
CMWaters wrote:The glasses...oh how many people have argued it.
It's not JUST the glasses from some of the better arguments.
1)It's the mannerisms
2)It's the fact that no one in that universe can even PICTURE Superman having a secret identity, so they don't try to put 2 & 2 together. They might note they look similar...but never stop to think they'd be the same.
3) Clark Kent is the most generic, average person ever. He looks like an average joe, has a fairly normal job, and doesn't bring any attention to himself. There are also probably thousands of people in Metropolis alone that have dark hair, medium build, and glasses.Great List, Critic! I totally agree with the kiss and time-travel. The plastic S-Shield should've been there though.
-
04.14.2009 - 20:42 | mmntw26
-
04.23.2009 - 11:15 | RAMPAGION
-
04.14.2009 - 20:42 | Firestorm94
-
04.23.2009 - 11:14 | RAMPAGION
I bet number one is the fact that no one can see it's him wearing glasses