Doctor Who Christmas Carol in 5 Seconds
Written by Phelous Sunday, 03 April 2011 22:38
Check out the official Phelous website right here!
|
Doug's Official Facebook Page | Order the 4th Year Anniversary autographed image! Less Than 100 Left! Once they're gone they're gone! |
-
You've created a TIME PARADOX Solid Sn- er Phelous! (Or how about Pholid Snakous?) I'm glad there's someone else around to point out the plotholes so I can remain a casual viewer. But now, I feel bad for not remembering certain blatant inconsistencies the "touching the other you = bad" . Although you could probably explain it away with the Big Bang from the Series 5 finale or something.
-
04.04.2011 - 00:04 | Majin47
-
This episode aired last year (Xmas Special). And the clips in this video (excluding the last two) are from the current run of Dr Who that started in 2005.
If your going to create rules like these and show the consequences then dont go and break them later on and have nothing happen. I thought the xmas special was very boring, they could have done anything but chose to do a scrooge story. Bah, humbug.
-
04.04.2011 - 13:05 | e33lafThose creatures are called Reapers, and they usually arrive whenever there is a paradox created in an established timeline in order to set things right again.
-
04.03.2011 - 23:39 | hollychristine
-
04.03.2011 - 23:52 | Gliblord
-
04.04.2011 - 03:31 | Phelous
I agree, I liked it too and it was a good story for Matt's Doctor, partly because Amy wasn't in it much I think he does better when she's not around. But they kinda obliterated Doctor Who's established rules of time travel there. There probably should have been some reason he was able to screw with Kazran's life like that.
By these rules if the Doctor doesn't like who you are as a person it's nothing a quick trip in the Tardis won't fix haha.
-
04.04.2011 - 12:23 | Gliblord
I'm sure the fans have come up with dozens of convoluted workarounds already. I remember reading somewhere that Kazran could touch his younger self without triggering those weird reapers because they "weren't the same people anymore, Eleven totally changed him!" Yeah, I'm sure Rose and her baby version were totally the same.
Also, wouldn't screwing with Kazran's past have changed his future so that he was no longer in that room watching his life change?
-
05.16.2011 - 19:30 | Fuery87Rose touching he younger self didn't cause the Reapers to appear, it just kind of made the situation worse. I think it may already be demonstrated a few times that simply coming into contact with yourself is not itself big enough of a paradox to bring the Reapers.
And since when can't time be rewritten? The Doctor has been rewriting time for like the entire series. He just makes a point that there are some things that can't be changed. Kazden's life apparently isn't one of those things.
-
04.04.2011 - 22:14 | montanker
-
04.05.2011 - 00:32 | EspanolBot
I think that the explanation was that since Rose prevented her father's death, that weakened reality enough for the Reapers to pass through once more and more paradoxes were imposed on reality.
Whether that's the official explanation or not, I don't know. If all else fails, just put it down to Timey Wimey etc.
-
04.04.2011 - 00:14 | Dragon-FangX
-
04.04.2011 - 03:38 | brick mooncode
-
04.04.2011 - 00:16 | mumbls
-
04.04.2011 - 00:44 | The_Awesometeer
-
I remember thinking the same thing when I saw this episode (which I did like very much, btw). When the boy and the old man were in the same room together I thought the doctor would tell them not to touch each other because
"the encounter could create a time paradox, the results of which could cause a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the space time continuum, and destroy the entire universe! Granted, that's a worse case scenario. The destruction might in fact be very localized, limited to merely our own galaxy", or something like that. ;)
-
Many geeky explanations (i.e. the time wound creatures only appeared because of a weak point created by multiple doctors and roses + her interfering in events) but at the end of the day they change the situation for the purpose of the story.
It's not like they did anything major like taking centuries of stories and lore about... Vampires for example, completely ignoring them and turning a creature once feared by many into a sparkly, whiny and most importantly boring creature. No one would be stupid enough to do that!!! Oh... wait...
-
04.04.2011 - 01:57 | punksweets
-
04.04.2011 - 02:09 | droppingpenny
-
04.04.2011 - 03:13 | Eruvadhril
-
04.04.2011 - 03:38 | brick mooncode
-
Well, the young and the old Kazram are not exactly in the same time period, when the doctor can't go back in time in a certain situation, he means, not in a few hour so I can stop this man to do the thing he's done behing me, but he can see what aliens let in the center of the earth or let a dying woman seen herself young before dying. He can change time, but not his time, like rose did when she save his father when the previous doctor and roses are supposed to see him dying, he can't go back in time and say to himself "warning, don't do this or you will lost a regeneration". It's not in the same level of time fuck up. and in father day, the doctor didn't react immediatly at the eventuality of the time's eater attack, he didn't think that would happens after rose saved her father, because it wasn't that "important", and the kindness of a old man is "less important" than the life or death of a time traveller's father.
plus, the doctor now think than history can being rewrite since flesh and stone, and the universe change do to the explosion of the tardis and the reboot of the universe, I supposed than that means new rules.
-
04.04.2011 - 03:57 | Kouadio
-
04.04.2011 - 04:05 | David2
-
04.04.2011 - 22:59 | bojak90
-
04.04.2011 - 04:32 | Akane1412
-
04.04.2011 - 05:38 | Loony
-
04.04.2011 - 06:07 | Flaregun
That's what I like about Doctor Who: they never let continuity get in the way of a good story.
Besides, it was Christmas. We all know the Rules of Time work differently at Christmas, how else could that fat dude in the sleigh visit the house of every kid on Earth in one night while simultaneously doing battle with the Devil while aided only by his trusty assistants Merlin and Droppo the comic relief Martian?
-
04.04.2011 - 06:33 | FunkyM
-
04.04.2011 - 06:37 | Cornwind EvilmanHey, the Doctor said it best.
"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect... but actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly... timey-wimey... stuff."
Honestly, I think the finer points of quantum travel and manipulation are so insanely complex that they change constantly and the Doctor uses shorthand to give his companions an idea of what's going on at the moment. In other words, do it well, and feel free to use time travel to do ANYTHING!
-
04.04.2011 - 08:47 | Loony
@Cornwind I think the truth here is that time works in plot-convenient ways. If it'd be too easy to just go vworp the TARDIS somewhere and save people (like in Moffat's The Girl on the Fireplace), then the Doctor can't do this and it's justified with technobabble. If a writer decides, however, that the story should be built around owning a time machine and going back in time and changing it (like in also Moffat's A Christmas Carol), then this is how time works. Continuity? It's not all that important and I don't think there is a point in trying to justify these inconsistencies.
-
07.30.2011 - 09:49 | DangerousLokiA valid assesement of the situation. But I think there's a much simpler answer. Matt Smith clearly used a Frankenhole.
-
04.04.2011 - 08:53 | loomCAT
-
04.04.2011 - 09:09 | LaytonmobileI thought even the parts without time travel sucked for this one, and it was just boring.
-
04.04.2011 - 09:10 | Bloodyrose
-
...for making the same point I made when the two Amys touched in the season finale. I even brought up that scene from Mawdryn Undead. I also love you for referencing Shadow of Memories (Shadow of Destiny for those of an American persuasion). It's one of my all-time favourite games and I thought no one else had ever heard of it.
-
04.04.2011 - 10:47 | Twelfth Doctor
-
04.04.2011 - 10:48 | RoseNoir90
I'm surprised when people moan about how when Kazaran cuddles his younger self (or when Amy touches Amelia in TBB) those flying monsters don't appear. The Doctor in "Father's Day" never outright says that touching another version of your self will cause time to be damaged; only that a paradox would weaken the protection of the church at that moment and give them extra strength.
That being said; yeah, the Doctor really does outright screw with time here and as much as he arguably improves Kazaran's life ("better a broken heart than no heart at all"), I don't see how it's something he has the right to do. Neither is this "time can be re-written" shtick that Moffat has brought in since he took over. It goes against over 40 years of established continuity that the Doctor cannot and will not use the TARDIS to change things once he's part of events. William Hartnell blatantly tells Barbara in The Aztecs; "You cannot change history. Not a single line!" Then you have Tom Baker refusing to change history even thought it means getting rid of the Daleks for good. And then we had Ten's whole breakdown about even attempting such a thing in Waters of Mars. And now it's something he does without a seconds thought? 0_o
Plot holes aside, I do like this Christmas episode, just for the original take on A Christmas Carol and Matt Smith is hilarious as ever. ^_^
-
04.04.2011 - 10:49 | cubs2084
-
04.04.2011 - 11:47 | MasterChief43If the Doctor had done what he had hoped to do, IE, make Kazran a good guy, that would have changed the whole nature of their first meeting, thus messing up time real good. BUT, he did not suceed - Kazran still hated the Doctor's guts and forgave him afterwards. As such, rewriting the timeline caused no damage. The Doctor's plan probably was to make Kazran good and then tell him to act bad to preserve time and space intact while still convincing him to save the ship. As for the whole why doesn't Kazran touching his younger self thing (which is far less creepy than it sounds) does not obliterate the universe, its because its the kid who traveled into the future rather than the adult into the past, like in Father's Day. As such, the effect is not present. Changing the past is far more dangerous than messing with the future.
To sum up, The Doctor can mess with other timelines but his own, and he at no point said or did anything to mess with his own timeline. The two versions of the same persion making contact paradox did not occur, because the situation was reversed. Happy?
-
04.04.2011 - 11:43 | MasterChief43And people, many of you seem to forget that Time is in flux due to the Time War. Ten freaked out in Waters of Mars because THAT was a fixed point, that if changed, would wreck what little stability time had left. When Amy and her younger self made contact, it was the END OF THE FRIGGIN UNIVERSE. It had already ended, all rules out the window, dirty tricks and paradoxes were IN with no consequences any greater than the END OF THE UNIVERSE! Time CAN be rewritten now, thats the new series's hook! The Doctor does not want to mess with his timeline, because even he does not know what might happen, not because it will end the the whole of reality. Those creatures in Father's Day only FEED on paradoxes, irregularities and the like. If they sense stuff like that, they go and have a snack. Its quite possible that they got lured by a Time Crack(pretty tempting) and just vanished for good. The rules HAVE changed and thats the friggin best thing about Doctor Who - everything can CHANGE and nothing is permanent. Its always new and its always fun. Rant over. Sorry for the double post.