Silent Hill Again
Written by Phelous Wednesday, 17 November 2010 21:21
|
Doug's Official Facebook Page | Order the 4th Year Anniversary autographed image! Less Than 100 Left! Once they're gone they're gone! |
-
11.17.2010 - 21:43 | montanker
-
11.17.2010 - 22:01 | brick mooncode
-
11.17.2010 - 22:15 | CyTheWriter
-
11.17.2010 - 22:25 | sickdog1028
-
11.17.2010 - 22:30 | Mr.Anderssson
-
11.17.2010 - 22:34 | FullmetalNinja25
-
11.17.2010 - 22:35 | Mr.Anderssson
-
11.17.2010 - 22:43 | FullmetalNinja25
-
11.17.2010 - 22:51 | H2O
-
11.17.2010 - 22:48 | Taufiq91
-
11.17.2010 - 23:48 | kshade
Yes. It's an old, ugly game with clunky controls but if you turn of the lights it's also very immersive and frightening. I'm not sure if I like 2 or 1 more, 3 is okay and 4… oh dear. Really had to force myself through it, it's so atrocious, boring and unpolished. Definitely play 1 and 2, check out 3 and 5 if you want moar and skip 4.
-
11.18.2010 - 00:30 | TheYetti
Go for it friend, if its on PSN they might have brushed up a few of the clunkier controls. If you scare easy, be sure to play with a friend. Im a puss so I played SH1 on down to bioshock in the company of good friends.
Honestly though its terrifying and gripping and the only game that might come close to matching its brand of horror might be fatal frame, but Silent Hill and its grotesque twisted visions beats ghosts any day.
-
11.18.2010 - 07:14 | Winkuru
When it come's to actually being scary i think the Project Zero (Fatal Frame for you) does a better and i'm not even fan of ghost stories.
What comes to SH1....well it maybe a little clunky but the controls really ain't that bad. The game actually hold's up quite nicely and i actually myself completed it for the first time few month's back (which is kinda shameful considering how much i love SH2 and SH3.
-
11.18.2010 - 01:16 | Jillers
-
11.17.2010 - 23:05 | Desh
-
11.17.2010 - 23:05 | Lotus Prince
What bothered me the most about Pyramid Head is that he really shouldn't have been in Silent Hill. He is a physical representation of James Sunderland's lust and violent tendencies. He has no relevant to Rose (or to Harry Mason) whatsoever. He's in the movie solely for fanservice. There's just one problem: the fans of the series would just be pissed off, because they know what Pyramid Head's deal is.
-
11.18.2010 - 00:27 | TheYetti
Yes but in the movie, The Otherworld isnt about Rose, its about Alessa. If Im not mistaken Alessa sees a similar picture to the one James sees in SH2 before being dragged off to be burned. So arguable she could have summoned this phantom of punishment to punish the people who hurt her. They get the basic premise of Pyramid Head down, Its not 100% but its good enough.
-
11.18.2010 - 15:47 | Lotus Prince
In the first Silent Hill game, the Otherworld was about Alessa rather than Harry. The function and sourth of the Otherworld in Silent Hill 2 is drastically different than the one in the first Silent Hill.
Also, Pyramid Head is not summoned to punish others; he's summoned to punish the one who (unconsciously) summoned him.
Not to mention that Alessa is trapped in a permanent nightmare; the monsters may come from her, but I doubt that they work for her.
Also, the only element of Pyramid Head that the movie creators got right is his general look.
-
11.17.2010 - 23:07 | Damonashu
-
11.17.2010 - 23:14 | Angel71090
-
11.17.2010 - 23:23 | Dragoniangirl
-
11.17.2010 - 23:37 | Adrenal Lynn
-
11.17.2010 - 23:38 | Deimos1984rd
-
11.17.2010 - 23:54 | kshade
-
11.18.2010 - 08:47 | Phelous
It's annoying to see a story get distorted during adaptation especially when it's not necessary to move it to the other medium or being done so the person involved in the adaptation can "put their touch" on it. Silent Hill's is really bad cause they added the witch shit which has nothing at all to do with the SH story.
I said it before but if they wanted to make a different story they should have done that. Silent Hill is really a place a lot of interesting stories could take place.
-
11.19.2010 - 18:40 | realvampiresdontsparkle
-
11.18.2010 - 00:04 | The_Awesometeer
-
11.18.2010 - 00:19 | TheYetti
.....Okay,
I'm just as big a silent hill fan as anybody else. But The Silent Hill movie was absolutely not bad. Admittedly it had flaws, Sean Bean shouldn't have been there and The Cheryl name change was a little stupid. But the things most people had problems with seemed like fanboy freakouts and worthless nitpicks.
The Cult- The Studio had their heart in the right place with this one. Multiple gods and sacrificing to them is something that was never really prevalent in America which was founded after Paganism left most of the world. But something American's know and understand is witch burning a grisly and inextricable part of our history.
Was it 100% faithful to the source...No
Did it work and make sense...Yes, considering the amount of religious nut jobs we have today would it surprise anyone that there was a crazy witch burning cult about
Rose- Yes Harry is iconic, and thats one of the reasons I like that they didnt put him in here. Look at the Resident Evil franchise. They have pussified and destroyed amazing iconic characters. With Silent Hill they dont have to worry if their doing justice to the character because he's not there. Instead we have a female character Rose, braving the hell of silent hill. No matter what social reprimands I may receive for saying it, Seeing a woman in this kind of situation makes it a lot more frightening and gives us a deeper feeling of hopelessness.
Pyramid Head and the Nurses - Frankly, I would have been disappointed if he didnt make an appearance. I didn't think and I believe neither did the filmmakers that their would be a film to cover each game. So they can't exactly wait to show him until the sequel. And as for who controls him...I dont think Dark Alessa has control over the nightmare,She may have some control, but the otherworld is an expression of Alessa's rage and rage usually lacks control. If you'll notice everything tries to attack rose when she first meets it. The Nurse scene was terrifying and until watching this I was to busy jumping to notice their plunging neckline. Justification for this is simple. Alessa's body is burned and destroyed, so she begins to resent and covet the bodies of the women around her AKA the nurses.
A lot of people don't like this movie because its not 100% faithful to the source material...do you really want it to be? Haven't you already played the game, know the story. Isn't the purpose of an adaptation to take the main idea and see where you can go from there. I think this movie was successful in that regard
All in all you have definitely lost sight of the most important thing of this movie. Atmosphere. Silent Hills main thing, its core thread that sews all the stories together, is it terrifying atmosphere. The sheer terror that claws at you as soon as that air horn blares, thats what matters. This movie captured that almost perfectly...
-
Why does seeing a woman in Silent Hill make it seem more scary and hopeless than if it were a man? This is really the intrinsic problem with the character change - it really reeks of American misogyny at almost every level. A man could never love his daughter so much he'd walk into hell for her (because men don't have all those weak emotions driving them, assumably). They put a woman in there because they knew that Americans and Westerners in general generally associate women with being weak both physically and emotionally. It is built into our culture to treat women as precious treasures. Don't believe me? Talk to some older folks or military servicemen about letting women on the frontlines in modern wars.
From a movie standpoint, Rose's role really felt like it should have been played by a man more as well. The female police officer, female cult leader, I mean this thing was a sea of estrogen. It would have been nice to have a male lead to balance it out. But then, it would have been a man versus woman dynamic which would chap our other misogynistic views of how woman can't fight men and men should never fight women because girls are more tender, weaker, softer, etcetera.
I am not accusing you, Yetti, of misogyny, outright, but I want you to strongly consider where your final point in defense of Rose being in the movie originates from. Why does a woman being in that role instead of a man seem so much worse to you? Why does it give us a deeper feeling of hopelessness, and moreover, should it in this day and age?
-
11.18.2010 - 01:26 | TheYetti
Again
I'm not saying its right, but the idea of a woman in this situation is more frightening because we grow up with the social stigma of men being the more violent sex. Every little boy gets into a few scraps as a kids, but a lot of little girls escape it. Also if a man can't fight he's veiwed as less valuable in our society. Again I'm not saying its right. But if the question is, who would I expect to have a harder time in Silent Hill, the House Wife, or The Father, I'd still go with the house wife.
As for Harry being able to love his daughter I don't think thats even a question. I'd expect any father to Bruce Cambell it up with a shot gun and a chainsaw to save their daughter, which is another reason I salute the sex change. This could have teetered on the edge of action thrillers we've all seen before. We've all see the man rampage through a room full of enemies to rescue his daughter/wife and its a little boring at this point. What I HAVEN'T seen in movies, is a mother willing to brave terror and despair to save her Daughter. This was actually a funky twist Hollywood rarely affords us. As for emotional weakness, I expect a man to go into a rage and panic, its a woman who I would expect to keep her cool in this kind of situation. Giving me another reason to salute the sex change.
As for all these women, I liked the main cast of a terrifying horror movie had mostly women in leading positions and roles and not as objects to flaunt their tits and get stabbed. I didn't honestly feel the need for a male character, no real void felt there.
Also, and I'm generalizing here, there are somethings a father and a daughter just wont understand about each other. That right there makes their bond a little less tender. Biologically and experience-wise, a father will not be able to share things with and advise his daughter in a great many things, While Mothers and daughters have a little bit more of an opportunity to understand each other, making that bond and the moment its threated a little bit more tender.
Again It sounds like a cop-out to say it, but Im not sexist. I love strong female characters in my stories. Buffy the Vampire Slayer is one of my favorite shows for many reasons, one of them being the strong female representation. And while some sexist undertones are present here, theres also some logical reasons why the sex change works
-
11.18.2010 - 07:16 | Heymlich
@ TheYetti:
I guess I have to disagree with you at this point.
I can understand the sex-change in someway, even Ganse himself said, that he wanted an female cast, because women would look more vulnarable than men. But the story where a mother fights everything to save her daughter is in my opinion a little old.
We saw it in Dark Water, the Ring and many other movies. Motherly instincts seem very natural and even woman, who are not exactly mothers seem to often try to rescue children, because of that.
That´s why I thought the first game was so original, making Alessas Mother the villain. Daliah was so great because she was so despicable and Christabella seems weak in her reasons compared to that woman.
In the game itself I got very frightened of many things and I won´t be more frightened if Harry was a woman and I think I would not have mattered If they did not changed that part.
Silent Hill is a place where normal weapons do work, but you can still get harmed from the monsters there. A man would be helpless the same way a woman would be. In my opinion it would be even more interesting because like you said, men tend to get very actionheroish in this movies, so a hero who would not be this way, would be something fresh.
That´s what I like about the games, too. You really seem very helpless an vulnarable, indifferent of what gender you are.
Another point that pissed me a little bit of, was that the Sean Bean Character seems not really caring about his daughter. It seems more like he wanted his wife back. That´s again the point you don´t see very much loving father-figures around in such movies, so again If the sex-change did´nt happen it would be more original and interesting to me.
_________________________ ______________________
About the cultthing in the movie. I think making them witchburners made the story much more simple then it should have been.
Silent Hill 1 is one of the most complicated games I´ve ever played because the whole cult, seem so mazed and everything. In fact all games seem to keep many secrets and the cult has something dark and forbidden about it, that you can´t touch as a whole. The things left in the dark are scary because of the human imagination.
Making there motives that clear (and involving the whole town) just takes a bit of the horror the cult should give you. In fact I was more annoyed of the preachings of Christabella, then scared.
Also I´m still not sure if the Cult is just evil or just a very diffrent system of believes, that has gotten perverted by it´s followers.
Silent Hill the Movie kept that very easy, they where just witchburners fighting the evils in the world, don´t recognizing they being the evil (whooo ironic).
What I wanted to say is that the original cult-plot could have confused some people so they kept it simple.
But I think they could have used the...
-
11.18.2010 - 15:50 | Lotus Prince
"I'm not saying its right, but the idea of a woman in this situation is more frightening because we grow up with the social stigma of men being the more violent sex. "
And yet Silent Hill scares the hell out of me whether I'm playing as Harry, James, or Heather. The Silent Hill series became iconic before Silent Hill 3 came out, and the first two games starred men.
Speaking of the misogynistic belief that women in horror films make the movie scarier, they had BETTER not ruin Heather's character by making her like Rose. Heather was a badass.
-
09.10.2011 - 22:44 | Mr. Vermin
-
A lot of christian saints were substituted for Gods. There was a whole controversy on it, and mistrust that certain populations were just pretending to be christians. This did happend more with blacks and natives for whatever reason.
That aside, this wasn't an original story but a retread of the game's first. Nothing added, and some things taken away. Do the changes make a better story? No. The Cult in the film doesn't work because it doesn't have a goal. It's motivation enough to burn someone but not to stay as a group. fact is Americans understand Cults and we've seen them do and believe lots of stupid things. People wouldn't have questioned a cult at all.
the whole guy thing, the first saw, and the first Hostel were the scariest, and both had men in the lead. The sequel to hostel with its female lead was bad.
It's not good to give into hollywood's dumb theory that people can't identify with a scared guy in a situation that he's helpless in.
-
11.18.2010 - 01:56 | TheYetti
The cult had a goal, to cleanse the world of sin. Its the same goal as the entire Christian Faith. And while some saints had replaced gods, a majority of Americas settlers were Protestants and Puritans, people who don't predominately believe in the saints. The Others practiced in secret meaning that section of the culture wouldn't really translate to today.
This is in a sense in the same thread as Shattered Memories. Its a new take on an old story so its not the original. But as its own story it holds up and is great to watch.
I didn't say Americans weren't familiar with cults that they know and love. Its Multiple Gods and sacrifice to them that Americans aren't familiar with.
Both the Saw and Hostel franchises are worthless torture porn, I wouldn't judge anything by their standards. To see my argument on why i like the sex change its above.
Hollywood is actually the one that puts MEN in scary situations, women in horror movies are usually their to get naked and die. A women living through a horrible situation is a new thing
-
11.18.2010 - 05:08 | dennett316
The things that are least familiar are usually what scare us the most, hence they should really have gone with that.
Also, women in horror movies surviving is absolutely nothing new...Nightmare on Elm Street, Alien, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Halloween and about a billion other horror flicks I'm no doubt forgetting. You're completely wrong on that point....though I do quite like the film. They're called scream queens, it would have been far more uncommon to stick with a man.
-
11.18.2010 - 09:00 | Phelous
I lost sight of the atmosphere!? I hate the movie for losing the atmosphere! That's what I kept saying... It had glimpses of it at the start but it fell apart very quick. Sean Bean interrupts tore it apart every time then we got bogged down by the damn witch burning cult who despite us having to listen blab on still apparently burnt Alessa because they didn't like her face. Dahlia spoke in riddles too but it eventually made sense.
I would have actually been happy to see Silent Hill 1's story translated to a movie. It would have been cool. I also when have been cool with seeing a completely different story. But not a bastardized version of SH1's story.
Harry going to Rose was pretty much just window dressing and I don't see why seeing a female in the situation should be that different.
And I did say Pyramid Head (despite him mostly being there for fan service) would have been all right pretty much if he had more of a purpose like in SH2.
-
11.18.2010 - 00:19 | TheYetti
there was never a moment in the otherworld that I felt safe. Every time that horn blared and the world changed it terrified me and thats what matters. This is Inescapably THE Silent Hill movie, and honestly aside from a few Hiccups. I couldn't be happier with it.
In my opinion it is the best video game adaptation ever made.
-
11.18.2010 - 00:25 | forsaken7089
He about sums it up. This is why I deleted the piece of shit movie from my hard drive. Keep in mind I had it in Blueray. It STILL wasn't worth keeping. At least with other movie tie ins they don't COMPLETELY fuck it up. Not even Resident Evil fucks it up this bad, as it's basically a spin off. It doesn't need to be that loyal. But this was a DIRECT copy of the game, which they then messed up every way possible.
-
11.18.2010 - 01:00 | TheYetti
What?! Resident Evil franchise destroyed everything it touched! It went from being a movie about zombies to a movie about cleaning up contrived plot holes and slowing down action scenes so they look utterly ridiculous. Killing all of its iconic cast off with pussification and retardation. NONE of the original feeling is there and the whole main idea is mangled.
The Silent Hill movie changed a FEW things, but mostly took the necessary steps to keep the spirit of the franchise alive within it.
This isn't a direct copy. Its more like shattered memories where they use the same names but its in a different situation, and for the same reason. Theres to much to live up to to make a direct copy.
-
11.18.2010 - 15:51 | Lotus Prince
-
11.19.2010 - 00:46 | BananaJane
-
11.18.2010 - 00:27 | Mr.Evil
And so we see the birth of Pheleus D1. What I want to know is this: where can I get some purple lightning? Does it come from the same clouds as purple rain?
Allons-y:
- The changes to the Silent Hill movie in comparison to the game remind me of the Doom movie adaptation. For example, demons are changed to mutants for some engimatic reason despite the fact that the Doom franchise has ALWAYS been about demons (can you feel the evil?). There must be some rule in Hollywood that requires the writing staff to mess up a successful storyline if it means being able to say "I did this!" on the credits.
Still, I didn't think the movie was too bad. At least it was more faithful to its source material than most video games movies... damning with faint praise, but it's something.
- Careful, Pheleus. If the universe collapses into itself because of all these paradoxes, I'll be rather cross, as I won't get a proper burial.
Good review.
-
11.18.2010 - 01:05 | EarthboundXE
-
11.18.2010 - 01:10 | Riotsword
I don't know how much this following theory holds water, but perhaps a reason why they unnecessarily changed Cheryl's name to Sharon was because they named the female lead 'Rose'. So they change it to make some sort of reference to a type of flower called 'Rose of Sharon'.
To the makers of the movie with their moon-logic (witch re-burnings and everything), it probably makes sense.
-
11.18.2010 - 02:16 | LordNiftySo they changed Harry's gender because they don't think fathers want to protect their kids, and so they could rip a line off from "The Crow"?
-
11.19.2010 - 00:54 | BananaJane
-
11.18.2010 - 03:46 | timusforlife
-
11.18.2010 - 09:03 | Phelous
-
Sorry Phelous but I really like the film. Yes it's flawed but I think it's a well made film. Christoph Gans is a great artist and I think that shows. Personally I think not using Harry Mason is a good idea as we know how his story goes where as in the film we don't.
The cop and the woman have a difficult relationship, it's unlike Harry and the cop in the first Silent Hill, where they were romantically attracted to each other. Hewre they have to co-exist to survive and personally I find that more terrorfying. Silent Hill is about survive and manipulation.
I think Sean Bean represents the real world as Silent Hill takes place in the realm of nightmares and at the end when they are in the same place but can't see each other that was really tragedic.
I thought the bit were she finds out what the town did was tranformative as she has been trusting the town folks to protect her but then she realises the projections are there to punish them. It is the sort of symbolism that Silent Hill is famous for.
The transition to the nether world is good and well done. The characters are well done as I actually cared, only character who is well developed in the game is Harry Mason.
-
11.18.2010 - 03:56 | akkuma420
-
11.18.2010 - 04:16 | LighticeSeriously you two, you're basically just complaining that this movie wasn't a direct repetition of Silent Hill 1. It's a different continuity with elements removed and added. Frankly, that's the best, if not the only way you can adapt a video game into the film format; stay too close and you could just play the damn game. The film retains the original atmosphere quite well, which is the most important thing.
It's not a perfect movie; some of the flaws which you point out are quite genuine - but it's hardly a bad movie either.
The sexy nurses and the Pyramid Head are remarkably easy to explain: the nurses representing Alessa's frustration over the fact that she'll never grow up to be sexually attractive, her hideous appearance being one of her traumas, and the Pyramid Head is her blind rage. Alessa isn't exactly in perfect control of even herself, as she herself admits, so it's hardly surprising that he attacks Rose and Cybil.
Alessa incidentally didn't die. It was made quite clear that she was "just" maimed for life. And Rose knows her daughter well enough that a Dark Alessa can't fool her just by looking the same.
The shift in the nature of the cult is just another case of pragmatic adaption. The original is essentially a twisted corruption of the Japanese pantheism and protector deities, despite of the Western names, so it's fairly logical to switch to a twisted corruption of Christianity in a Western-made adaptation - it's far more disturbing to see something familiar twisted into monstrous than something you have no direct connection to.
Seriously Silent Hill fans, try for once judge the film by its own merits, instead of complaining it doesn't match the game perfectly. It has its own set of symbolism which simply uses imagery familiar to you.
-
11.18.2010 - 09:00 | Cyborcat
Right, because complaining about plot holes big enough to drive a truck through, characters who do the STUPIDEST things imaginable just to help move the plot along, and other characters who add next to nothing to the story ... yes, clearly that means we wanted to be exactly like the game and weren't judging it on its own merits AT ALL.
The move was overly simplified and yet was a confusing mess at the same time. It's a shit movie, no matter what it's based on.
If you like it anyway, great. But if you want to debate about it, don't just ignore the points we're making just because we don't agree with you.
And people wonder why I don't like to talk about the movie. Doesn't matter what I say, someone will always completely ignore it and argue with me based on their pre-conceived notion of what they think I think rather than actually paying attention to what I'm actually saying.
-
11.18.2010 - 09:13 | Phelous
Seriously you're basically just saying you didn't really watch the video if you're saying that's the only point made. I hardly said well everything I hate in this movie is because it wasn't Silent Hill 1 so it sucks.
Those points for Pyramid Head and the nurses are complete guess work as the film doesn't give any evidence to back those up.
It's actually not very clear in the movie if she "died" when dark Alessa came but it's not the point with the aging thing. She was still aged and the cult wasn't...
I did judge it on it's merits and to me it failed on them. I wanted a movie to draw me into the atmosphere of Silent Hill and while looking like it might do that with some parts towards the beginning it destroyed it all about halfway.
-
11.18.2010 - 23:30 | MPSai
How was it a direct repetition of Silent Hill 1? I mean, the town being abandoned due to coal fires? The cult being vaguely Christian and burning witches? And the complete elimination of any real ending even in the movie's own continuity because of that exact change? What happens? Alessa goes nuts and rapes the cult leader with barbed wire. Kay. That's exactly the same as a demonic god being born right?
Not to mention all the goofy crap with the town being on a haunted towns website and cliche rednecks being all "no one don't go down that way no more" and Rose's still retarded insistence on going there. It was more subtle in the game. The cult was drawing Cheryl back but neither she nor Harry were aware of this, in their minds they were just going on vacation to a normal resort town. This makes the events take Harry even more by surprise.
-
11.18.2010 - 04:50 | jurf-rokstar
So, it all makes sense. Time traveling Phelous created Phelous D1 who was the Phelous who was trap in the Otherworld. Wait, is Phelous gonna expand on his Shattered Memories Review? I thought Dena was still playing that? Oh well. Why does Linkara's video quality look different? It's not bad just different.
-
11.18.2010 - 10:29 | Zeky0ZekyI think it's because Linkara use different editing program than Phelous.
-
11.18.2010 - 10:52 | jurf-rokstar
-
11.18.2010 - 04:57 | Shinigami
-
11.18.2010 - 06:09 | auxFACTOR
I agree with your review 95%...
except whe you blame Christophe Gans for the films problems. He is a very talented director and has a real passion for the games (he also wants to make an Onimusha movie)>
The real culprit is Roger Avary, the film's writer. He took a lot of creative licences with the SH1 mythos and it wasn't well executed (included the lack of symbolism). And worse of all, HE STILL THINKS THAT HIS SCRIPT WAS A BETTER STORY THAT SH1's!!!
Well, he's in jail for vehicular manslaughter and he's ben taken off writing Silent Hill 2... which could be a good or bad thing.
NOTE: Silent Hill 2 movie will actually be based on Silent Hill 3. How? I have no fucking clue...
-
11.18.2010 - 06:34 | Cyborcat
-
11.19.2010 - 00:52 | BananaJane
-
11.18.2010 - 16:49 | Mr_Faraday
-
11.19.2010 - 00:53 | BananaJane
-
11.27.2010 - 06:51 | Heymlich
-
11.18.2010 - 06:13 | Illya KuriakinThat is an awesome Pin Head t-shirt.
-
11.18.2010 - 09:02 | Cyborcat
I did see the Shattered Memories box in the background, but at the start I thought it was just a mistake :D
(BTW Phelous, there's a "Resident Hazard" type of video on Youtube called "Resident Thriller" you might enjoy!)