Phelous is the best reviewer on this site.
Day of the Dead 2
Written by Phelous Wednesday, 10 February 2010 22:42
|
Doug's Official Facebook Page | Order the 4th Year Anniversary autographed image! Less Than 100 Left! Once they're gone they're gone! |
Comments (108)
-
02.10.2010 - 23:04 | GutterMouth
-
02.10.2010 - 23:13 | joey_falconettiyou god damm right
-
02.10.2010 - 23:37 | ThatGuyInTheHeadband
Blasphamy! Though he still is a great reviewer that I always look forward to seeing.
-
02.11.2010 - 00:05 | Apathetic One[b]If you pause the video at 3:33 you can see a sign that reads, ''Romero Ward''...weird.[/b]
-
02.11.2010 - 13:03 | Phelous
I bet Romero was thrilled.
-
02.11.2010 - 01:04 | zachthemanoh god i own this crap it cost me 50p
did you know the peaple who made this produced the day of the dead remake and thay are doing the same with creepshow. also thay made a creepshow 3 and its worse than day of the dead 2, well almost
if any one out thir owns this on dvd check out the comentery track the peaple that made this actully think thay did a good job with this LOL
-
02.11.2010 - 05:25 | Richard WeskerThis is what I keep trying to tell people.
-
02.10.2010 - 23:31 | ginger0215
your both god damn right! only second to the nostalgia critic (and even then it is pretty damn close)
-
02.10.2010 - 23:34 | Adrenal Lynn
Oi, that purring MetroPCS commercial creeps me out.
Anywho, there are so many plotholes to this thing, if I stayed up to try and count them all, I wouldn't get enoguh sleep for my test tomorrow. All I can say ir Romaro must feel realllly intimidated by these blickbuster zombie movies. :dry:
-
02.10.2010 - 23:39 | Spokavriel
[color=#bd527b]How the.. Did the people at Tarus even watch any of the movies in the Frahchise at all before making that crap?[/color]
-
02.11.2010 - 13:00 | PhelousThey probably didn't watch this one either.
-
02.10.2010 - 23:47 | NEUTRO!
Is it just me or is the overacting head of the hospital basically a bald Tim Gunn?
-
02.10.2010 - 23:41 | SpazzMaster
Hello! :cheer:
-
02.10.2010 - 23:46 | Lotus Prince
Hey, when you were shooting your gun with no special effects whatsoever, were you using the pistol sound from the original Doom game? Kickass!
Also, nice move, spelling "Rayden" the original way!
-
02.11.2010 - 13:07 | PhelousYeah I've always stuck with the old console way of spelling Rayden for Komedy.
-
"a crocodile thing-a-ma-jig" WITH REAL CROCS! ROFL COPTER.
I never liked the "Big lipped Alligator Moment" bit.
-
02.10.2010 - 23:53 | GullysonPhelous, you did it again. You're a genius.
Very funny review.
-
02.10.2010 - 23:59 | Godzillafan1113
nice review
-
02.10.2010 - 23:57 | Deimos1984rd
Whew....glad they didn't show the zombie baby.
-
02.11.2010 - 00:06 | SpotTheShingoT-Virus? No! It was Trioxin!
(Obscure?)
-
02.11.2010 - 13:01 | PhelousThat'd be Return of Day of the Living Dead 2.
-
02.11.2010 - 00:08 | Fluffyman
I'd think Brad Jones shares your pain about sequels that have the titles but nothing to do with the originals.
-
02.11.2010 - 00:20 | IMONFIREGUY
hes still waiting to hear of a zombi 7
-
this is probably [color=red]the biggest insult to zombie movies ever[/color]
more so than the day of the dead remake
the title itself will make any romero fan cringe considering the original is, in a way, night of the living dead 3 or dawn of the dead 2(making this a really bad sequel to a really great partial sequel)
i hope in another twenty or so years we dont end up seeing a day of the dead 3 on the market
-
02.11.2010 - 00:31 | Doc Holidae
ahahahaha! the ad that played before the video was for a company called "Fellowes." the ad started with a guy saying "people everywhere are talking about Fellowes" i thought, "yea, people should be talking about Phelous!")i know it's not pronounced that way, but it COULD be given the spelling ;) )
-
02.11.2010 - 00:27 | Bonkers
... I don`t know what to say about this movie.
But did someone notice that around 3:24 a sign on a wall of the mental hospital says "Romero Ward"? Really, such a crappy movie and then make a "reference" to Romero.
-
02.11.2010 - 00:59 | ZoltonAwesome. You're like, my favourite reviewer on here and stuff.
Please review 'Ben and Arthur' and/or 'The Room'.
-
02.11.2010 - 01:09 | WojohoskiGreat review as always!
One slight correction. The signs on the computer screen are not Hieroglyphics, but Cuneiform. However, it seems to be gibberish, at least if it's in Akkadian or Hittite. Of course, I'm not sure why I would expect anything in this movie to make sense. I suppose it could be in Luwian or old Persian, but I think that would be giving the movie too much credit.
-
02.11.2010 - 13:08 | PhelousAh ok, well the main thing is the vial didn't look like any kind of writing.
-
02.11.2010 - 14:29 | WojohoskiExactly! It makes no sense.
-
02.11.2010 - 01:35 | LUrabbi
Wow. That movie was so off, so wrong, so mind-boggingly incorrect, it was like the Twilight of zombie flicks.
-
09.14.2011 - 16:19 | Laharl
No no, if this was the Twilight of zombie flicks, it would have a major cult following, despite people constantly calling it gay and stupid
-
WOW, wow there were allot of cutaways when the gore was going to happen. Hope you didn't go soft on us Phelous and started removing the gory parts from your reviews. Maybe the movie just didn't have gore in it to begin with. I hope that's the case :S
-
02.11.2010 - 02:41 | dennett316
He showed the dickhead dude in full on "10lbs of steak sellotaped to his face" zombie mode....I basically think this movie had about a $50 budget. They couldn't even afford muzzle flare for the guns for shit's sake!!
How bad must your company be if it's effects are outdone by a low budget movie from 1985?
-
02.11.2010 - 13:10 | PhelousOh I didn't try to cut out any gore, the movie did that itself.
Yeah it's amazingly sad how badly Day of the Dead out did this POS effects wise, and of course in every other way too.
-
02.11.2010 - 02:37 | dennett316Wow....that guy from Dawn of the Dead looked a lot like Hugh Laurie of House and Blackadder fame.
Anyway, great review of an obviously horrible shitty movie.
Oh, and the Romero Ward?? Why did they bother referencing the man when they were basically shitting all over the name of one of his classics?
I actually feel personally insulted that a movie as bad as this was made...awful. :X
-
02.11.2010 - 02:45 | Ps2KWell... looking at it as a low budget zombie flick, this one is pretty enjoyable to watch with a few friends and some beers.
But it's a nice review :D
-
02.11.2010 - 03:44 | Obscurus Lupa
Why was this trying to be a comedy? Isn't it supposed to be a zombie movie...and not a comedy?
Dug the Big Lipped Alligator reference. :D
-
02.11.2010 - 13:12 | PhelousI really don't think it knew what it was in any sense.
-
02.11.2010 - 04:00 | KaylaKazeI just realized what movie Phelous needs to review: Pulse 2.
I generally don't watch horrible movies, but I loved Pulse and Kairo, so I watched Pulse 2 hoping it'd get decent at some point. It didn't. I still plan on eventually watching Pulse 3 anyway though, and hey, it has a slightly better score on IMDB than 2 so it shouldn't be as painful to sit through.
-
02.11.2010 - 04:58 | Shinigami
I hate zombie movies and this movie dosen't help to change that at all.
-
02.11.2010 - 05:07 | Evil Betty
This movie actually has a few interesting concepts intermixed in it and might have fared better as a movie if it hadn't been connected to Day of the Dead at all.
-
02.11.2010 - 05:27 | Richard WeskerDay of the Dead 2: Contagium is even worse than the Day of the Dead remake, if you can even believe that.
-
02.11.2010 - 06:08 | SpecterM91
Holy shit, this movie exists. Why? How is this possible?
-
02.11.2010 - 13:04 | PhelousTaurus being evil.
-
02.11.2010 - 06:26 | iRaptorIt's a Stanley thermos...
-
02.11.2010 - 07:23 | AdventChild
If Romero was dead, he'd be rolling in his grave to rise up again and kill all the employees at Taurus Entertainment Company for this brain dead prequel-sequel crap.
-
02.11.2010 - 13:04 | PhelousAs he's not I'm sure he was rolling his eyes.
Only registered users can write comments!
Powered by Compojoom comment 4.2.1
