Far Cry
Written by Film Brain Friday, 09 October 2009 05:44
|
Doug's Official Facebook Page | Purchase Premium Membership Now! Only available till the end of April! |
-
10.09.2009 - 05:54 | Welshy
-
10.09.2009 - 12:08 | Matthew G[i]Still, it doesnt change the fact that you gave
Transformers 2 a higher score than Inglorious Basterds. [/i]
That one will haunt him for all eternity (to be fair, he said he rated Transformers 2 with his brain turned off in his article - I wonder why the ratings are now gone ...).
Anyway, great review.
-
10.09.2009 - 18:47 | cheesoid
-
10.09.2009 - 18:59 | cheesoid
-
10.10.2009 - 05:08 | Wermincheesoid could you please troll away from here.
-
01.10.2011 - 15:08 | Dr.MerkwürdigHey Cheesoid - go kill self with petril
-
04.29.2012 - 14:01 | Pancake of Doom
-
10.09.2009 - 05:56 | Carnivorous FilmsUwe Boll is officially the Devil. I'd box him ;)
-
10.09.2009 - 06:03 | Zerbrennendannrennen
-
10.09.2009 - 06:03 | YigSnakeDaddyAn awful Boll movie? Now this is surprising.
-
10.09.2009 - 06:04 | Vault Master
-
10.09.2009 - 06:09 | DakotaCruzwait a second. If a car was hanging by a helicopter by a wire and that wire snapped, yes it will go up.
Would it go all the way up to the blades, well depends on tension, but you make it seem like it wouldn't go up at all?
-
10.10.2009 - 00:15 | shaolindave
-
10.11.2009 - 06:02 | SnyderofberlinI'd like to point out that it also depends on the elasticity of the wire. Wire generally isn't that elastic and thus doesn't bounce back as easily - if the cord was more metal than anything else it wouldn't bounce more than a little bit and then just hang there. it definitely wouldn't swing up high enough to get caught in the blades and bring the helicopter down.
I've never heard of a grappling hook using elastic cord, so the scene is still pretty stupid. :)
-
10.09.2009 - 06:16 | Phelous
-
10.09.2009 - 06:16 | Sanosuke
-
10.09.2009 - 06:18 | Fluffyman
-
10.09.2009 - 06:21 | MiriamG
-
10.09.2009 - 07:02 | Sir JoeThat sucks that Handsome Tom was cut from the film, you know Stuttering Craig of Screwattack is supposed to be in the film as well, his scene probably got cut too, ah well. Probably all the better that way for both of them.
Anyway great review Matt.
-
10.09.2009 - 07:06 | der_ketzer
-
10.09.2009 - 07:29 | teleportnice review
-
10.09.2009 - 07:32 | spawnofsatan0666
-
10.09.2009 - 07:43 | ReanimatedBit
-
10.09.2009 - 07:48 | SirPongoGreat review Matt :)
If memory isn't failing me, before Handsome Tom and Stuttering Craig split up they asked for a fund raising in order to appear as extras on this "film". Don't remember the amount but I'm fairly sure that it was quite a lot of money. According to wikipedia both Craig and Tom are in the film.
-
10.09.2009 - 07:55 | BS Digital QGeneral Hammond? NOOOOOOOO!
-
10.09.2009 - 11:17 | A7X4EV3R
-
10.09.2009 - 08:03 | eXtreme
-
10.09.2009 - 08:07 | ShaggyTheShamanI can't watch Til Schweiger without thinking of his character from SLC Punk. That would've probably made this movie a lot better.
-
10.09.2009 - 08:08 | Herr WozzeckActually, a word on Till in [i]Inglourious Basterds[/i]: I got the impression that he was one of those characters whose presence counted more towards something. Plus, there's no denying that there's something incredibly badass about keeping a gun pointed at someone's testicles for an entire scene of people talking.
But wow, to think that this guy was in such an awful movie! Makes me wonder what Rampage is going to be like...
-
10.09.2009 - 08:31 | DakotaCruzhis character in IG was awesome!
-
Why in the hell is that guy allowed to put his videos on the site? He sucks even worse than Uwe Boll -_- YOU SUCK FILM BRAIN. YOU SUCK!!!!!
-
10.09.2009 - 21:54 | TheDailyCynicYou should try wording your argument more properly than "YOU SUCK YOU SUCK!!!" if you aren't just baiting for thumbs down.
Film Brain is one of the slightly lesser talents on TGWTG, I'd be lying if I didn't admit I much more look forward to the new NC, Spoony vid or Linkara review than his BMB or text reviews. But he does not "suck", and is up against a lot of strong talent on this site, and with every video he seems to improve. He still needs to work on timing and some aspects of delivery, as well as making sure his comments come across as true flaws in the movie rather than nitpicks (though nobody's going to claim that in THIS review), but he improves on this in each successive video.
I don't agree much with his taste in movies or analysis thereof as comes through in his reviews, but that's a matter of opinion rather than of style. Though with regards to the reviews, there still seems to be a vague air of irritating pretentiousness he seems unable to shake. Maybe its just me, or maybe it will improve over time. Mostly it may be that I'm just so jaded I hate virtually everything in the cinema, and so don't like the fact he's generally so soft and positive in his reviews. As a fan of Alien Nation, I even hated District 9 (and I think just about everyone who saw Alien Nation hated District 9, so much of the plot and setting is ripped off from it they should have a viable plagiarism case). And then he rips into the ONE movie I liked this summer, Inglourious Basterds. But I can forgive him for that, quite a few people don't like Tarantino, though in regards to IB hate in general (and it certainly seemed to come through in his review) it mostly seems to emerge because they don't [i]get[/i] the movie, they accept it at face value and, as such, are rightfully horrified by it.
Christ I've rambled, but I might suggest that you blog some reviews of your own. If Film Brain does indeed "SUCK!!!" then getting on TGWTG should be a cinch, right?
-
10.09.2009 - 08:22 | Rigs83
-
10.09.2009 - 08:24 | Yellow 13ohhh Udo... what did you do to yourself? you were AWSOME as Yuri in Red alert 2! ohh the shame
-
Nice here list of that i think you sud talk about in your show:
Camp Rock
Mr. and Mrs. Smith
Speed II
Plump Fiction
Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot
The Dukes of Hazzard (2005)
Dogma
Just One of the Girls
Daredevil
Catwoman
The Crow Salvation
Superman Returns
Wonder Boys
Day of the Dead (2007)
City of the Living Dead
The Ring 1 and 2
Pretty Woman
Attack of the 50 Ft. Woman
Independence Day
Twelve Monkeys
The Matrix Revolutions
Death Proof
The Day After Tomorrow
Even Cowgirls Get the Blues
My Super Ex-Girlfriend
Junior
and whole lot more
-
Maybe someone should try their luck with Farcry 2, that game was nothing like the first, and was FUCKING AWSOME.
If they don't use Uwe Boll, it could turn out at least average.
-
10.09.2009 - 08:44 | LeonaruThanks for your constructive criticism, Hasta la vista.
If you donnot like Filmbrain, stop watching his reviews.
If you want him to do something different, tell him what he should change.
-
10.09.2009 - 08:47 | theturdwhisperertheir cold so they take their cloths off... lol and wtf
-
10.09.2009 - 09:13 | WristWatchMafiaJesus christ Film Brain, did you do any freaking research for the film?
The whale watching tour is in BC, renowned for its whale watching. Rope, especially entwined steel rope, has a high degree of elasticity, and would spring back to shape if stretched by oh say a car. Almost certianly shooting up a distance before its kinetic energy is depleted.
As for the needle thing, most kevlar that will stop bullets is completely ineffective against a knife. The reason being that the bullet is crushing flesh rather the cutting, and the only reason non-cermaic bullet proof vests even work is by spreading that crushing force into a wider area. Something you *cannot* do with, say, a bladed impliment, or a needle (it just shoves the fibres out of the way).
Also: body armor can only take so many hits before it becomes increasingly less effective. It's not a magic anti-bullet spell Film Brain. As for shooting him in the eye, presumably common freaking sense.
The saw is clearly a lumber saw, as indicated by the sawdust. The laser sight is probably used to tell when enough timber has passed to get a decent size cut of wood.
-
10.09.2009 - 10:01 | TacTic
-
10.09.2009 - 12:28 | Film Brain
If you're referring to the armor on the super-soldiers who are (or supposed to be) [i]impervious[/i] to bullets, then it shouldn't have knocked it down, even if it the blasts managed to penetrate.
Why would there be a lumber mill on [i]secret research base[/i]?
The rope may have been elasticated but it would not fly upward in a perfect arc like in the film.
-
I take it FB, that you don't take criticism well.
you say "The rope may have been elasticated but it would not fly upward in a perfect arc
like in the film." but clearly you took time to mention it in the video and then scoff at the idea.
Or at least be a bit less defensive sounding. I don't think any one here would argue that Boll makes bad movies, but if you're going to rip on a scene, and it's not in fact a fact, don't keep that up after it's been called out.
-
10.09.2009 - 12:33 | Film Brain
-
10.09.2009 - 12:41 | DakotaCruzgo rewatch the part in the video, you seem to be making it clear that the rope wouldn't go up, in any fashion due to gravity.
-
10.09.2009 - 15:20 | Film Brain
-
10.10.2009 - 02:34 | WristWatchMafiaIt shouldn't have knocked it down, even if it was just a human. Bullets don't have enough force to knock someone off their feet, let alone send them flying.
This was not, however, your complaint in the review.
There's a lumber mill because it's BC, I guess. You should've brought up the fact that it's clearly a rented lumber yard they're filming in. But your criticism in the review was, I quote "What is that even for?", not "Why is that even here?"
As for the rope, watch this:http:// www.youtube.com/watch? v=ox0wpBT52xI& feature=related
A good bit of steel cable flies above were it is attached to the pulley.
I consider your reviews very good Film Brain, and enjoyable. But don't pull a Confused Mathew and sink into poorly researched slough. The Equilibrium review was too good for that.
-
10.09.2009 - 09:23 | Tigro
-
10.10.2009 - 01:24 | empathy121
Sorry, couldnt resist ;)