<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Cloverfield - Trailer Review</title>
		<description>Comments for Cloverfield - Trailer Review at http://thatguywiththeglasses.com , comment 1 to 11 out of 11 comments</description>
		<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:40:54 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>hi</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-20724</link>
			<description>hi;);):'( - ToribioPrince96</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:06:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>That's it! Time to figure this out...</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-18710</link>
			<description>*goes to wikipedia and types Cloverfield* 

&quot;Filmmakers decided to create a teaser trailer that would be a surprise in the light of commonplace media saturation, which they put together during the preparation stage of the production process. The teaser was then used as a basis for the film itself. Paramount Pictures encouraged the teaser to be released without a title attached, and the Motion Picture Association of America approved the move.[22] As Transformers showed high tracking numbers before its release in July 2007, the studio attached the teaser trailer for Cloverfield that showed the release date of January 18, 2008 but not the title.[11] A second trailer was released on November 16, 2007 which was attached to Beowulf confirming the title.[27]&quot;

Oh.....That explains that. I thought I was going to go insane. - Crystal6</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:40:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Title</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-14680</link>
			<description>Actually, the title of the movie was the date that was shown. But, since most people started calling it &quot;Cloverfield&quot; over the internet because of a rumor started by one of the staff, they decided to change the name of the movie, so people wouldn't get confused.

And not know what it is is really the fun part of the movie. I mean, you figure it out eventually. - Mr Dark</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:49:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-11037</link>
			<description>When I first saw the trailer I thought it was another movie with aliens in it..until I saw the movie..

Too bad Donkey Kong wasn't in it.. :( - Oreo</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:21:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What's wrong with the mic in this episode?</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-11004</link>
			<description>It sounds very echoed - TehZorzGuy</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:23:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-9092</link>
			<description>Oh yes, I remember when the Cloverfield trailer came out, and everybody went to these crazy extremes that they knew what the monster was.  Its actually pretty ingenious; you can't really describe the monster, you just have to see it to know what it looks like. :o - Poof E Hair</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:20:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-6522</link>
			<description>Rediculously not funny... - Green-Hell</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:32:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-5096</link>
			<description>This was the first video I`ve seen from you. I discovered it actually by searching for the infamous Cloverfield trailer. But this video was way better then the actual trailer and made me immediately a fan of you  :) - Anvil</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:41:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-3309</link>
			<description>Jesus? lol - Dove</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:01:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-2153</link>
			<description>that was ok at best - raza301</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:52:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/46-cloverfield-review#comment-279</link>
			<description>have to admit it. but when this first came out this was the first movie i saw by you. - Horribafuckus125</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:36:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
