Blogs

TGWTG's Community Blogs.

Subscribe to feed Viewing entries tagged Cartoon Corner

Cartoon Corner: A Fish Tale Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 02 May 2012
in animated movie review


EPISODE 25: After 2 years of reviewing crap Whyboy finally takes a look at something good from the bottom of the sea. ENJOY

PS. To everyone the box art and title for this movie in the UK, which is “Help I’m A Fish,” is ten times more awesome then the box art and title of this North American copy.

A Fish Tale is owned by A. Films A/S

http://cartooncornerwhyboy.blogspot.ca/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cartoon-Corner/198650010208211
Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/CartoonCornerWB

If you have any requests contact me at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The Net Dwellers: http://thenetdwellers.webs.com/
Manic Expression: http://manicexpression.webs.com/
0 votes

Whyboy Spotlights... Detentionaire

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Friday, 20 April 2012
in Animation
Detention, a time where troublemakers are forced to just sit and think about what they have done and “supposedly” teaches them to never do it again. When really they are back to doing whatever got them in trouble as soon as they are let out the door. In my experience with detention, only hearing second-hand info, it comes off as a very minor punishment and in no way teaches the you what anything while in there and only holding them for about half an hour before they are released. So, detention in my school may have been too lenient but now we got Detentionaire hat may just take it too far in the other direction. The story goes that Lee Ping and his best friends, Holger Holgaart and Camillio “Cam” Martinez are starting their first year of high school at A. Nigma High. That is, until he was falsely accused of pulling off the biggest prank in high school history and sentenced to one full year of detention by the new half cyborg principal General Barrage. You know what they say - do the crime, do the time. Now, every day, Lee must escape the detention, infiltrate a new social clique (Nerds, Jocks, Goths stc.), and unravel yet another piece of the gigantic, mysterious prank and deduce who is the culprit who framed him simply called “Radcircles.”
Already by the time I heard this in the dozen of teasers I saw on Teletoon I was really looking forward to Detentionaire. It had the one thing that makes me love them uncontrollably and that is mystery. I’ve been starving for some animated mystery shows like the criminally under-appreciated Disney’s Filmore and Detentionaire felt like it could truly quench that hunger and it did. When I started watching the show the theme song is the perfect first impression. One of my major factors as to whether I like a show or not is the intro and Detentionaire doesn't disappoint in that department at all. The opening's addictive opening music gets the adrenaline pumping and puts yah in the right mood for a more grimy solo sleuth show which I just love. The use of contrasting sizes and colours creates a visually beautiful array of textures and this has the one thing I love in a opening "flow." All the visuals match the music dead on and the visuals flow directly into one another creating the flow that I love.
Detentionaire is definitely one of the more shining examples when combating the “All of today’s cartoons suck” trolls because Detentionaire’s story balances both quirky comedy and mystery to a fantastic degree… well most of the time.  The mysterious plotlines of “radcircles,” Lee’s past, and putting together how the big prank came together fleshes out the mystery and making the viewer almost NEED to find out what happens next. That’s exactly what happens to me everytime I watch a truly mysterious episode. But sometimes Detentionaire’s mystery is overpowered by its quirky comedy ending in our characters acting completely moronic like in the episode “28 Sneezes Later.” Yah I think you all know where this is going from the title. Short story is that while Lee escapes from detention again chasing after A. Nigma High’s mascot the Tazelwurm, who looks like a rejected character from Spliced, Cam, Holger and two other students are fighting “Flu Zombies.” And while this is going on Barrage is having a chat with… "Colonel Von Virus."
… So, yeah, the show can really turn the silly dial up to 11 creating the real jarring feeling where while Lee is trying to escape from an exploding soda pop factory, by going into another about to explode underground passageway, robotic Tazzelwurms pop out of no where and after they are dispatched it’s only met with a mild head scratching moment for Lee. Wouldn’t the next logical step be… oh I don’t know… asking the freaking factory owners why there’s a secret passage way to a place where there’s robotic lizards ready to rip people’s faces off? But it probably is that most of this will be explained in a later episode but it still seems like a jarring idea to throw in robots and then immediately drop them until a later episode. There was also the episode “15th Grader” which is this series’ special public service announcement on bullying and let me just say my one thought on that episode. BLEH! Please we’ve seen probably hundreds of these bully PSAs in cartoons and in always amounts to some of the most ham handed speeches ever uttered that are so unbearably sappy it makes you want to puke. But really the good episodes outweigh the total embarrassing one’s. The only thing I hate is that the worst episodes turn out most of the time to bring the key clues to the mystery. *Groan*
Moving on from the episodes to the characters. While most are stock characters like the Goths, the nerds, and the skater dudes, they really are more for stereotype humor, which I do find funny. It reminds me of the cliques from, Rock Star’s, Bully (which is one of my favorite games of all time. Basically picture GTA for kids) who were all shameless stereotypes but pushed to the extreme to the point of parody. I think this point can be cemented by saying that the nerd clique has a DDR machine that works by “dancing” equations on a humongous calculator. It’s freaking hilariously surreal.
The main focus is on our main character Lee and his three friends; Holger, Cam and the school bully, Biff Goldstien, and thankfully these four are quite interesting characters. Starting with the most stereotypical of the bunch Cam. Though loyal to Lee and helping with his endeavors when he can he'd just as soon ride Lee's new found wave of popularity after the prank as long as it will last. Cam shows a rather strong interest in finding a girlfriend but fails due to using pick-up lines as charming as a tube sock, which drives his motivation to try and keep Lee from openly denying his status as the prank master, as Lee's fame helps Cam score attention with girls. Now this is a very different spin on the best friend character basically Cam is Lee’s B.F. but he is completely fine with using him in order to make himself popular which at the time of writing this spotlight has placed him as a suspect for being the mastermind of the prank “Radcircles.” Interesting. 
Holger, on the other hand, is almost the complete opposite character archetype of Cam. While Cam’s loyalty sways by how it suits his needs, Holger is Lee's obsessively loyal friend and A. Nigma High's Scandinavian exchange student. Though he appears and acts incompetent in all things, on occasion having to be bailed out of trouble by Lee, the value of his few skills have proven to exceed his incompetence. Hoger is the definite comic center of the show hands down with most of his antics centered on his obsessive loyalty. Even when the show turns the silly dial to 11, Holger is always the one that keeps the silliness bearable and allows me to keep watching the sometimes-lead paint drinking awful comedy bits.

Biff is the fan favorite of the cast and I can definitely see why. As the wiki for Detentionaire states Biff “…is a gentle giant with a soft spot for his pet cat” which definitely doesn’t sell who Biff actually is. The writers made sure that Biff wasn’t in any meaning of the world “gentle” except to his cat but he stills shows his true colors. Biff while in the middle of school acts like the big tough bully who’ll pummel your face in by just breathing funny to him and in detention… he still looks like he’ll pound your face in by breathing on him funny. But Biff finds more fun in being a sarcastic wise ass, constantly mocking Lee and all the crap that he gets himself into. Sure Biff helps Lee out but not before verbally prodding him. If I were to compare Biff to another character I say he takes his snarky behavior from Patrick Jane from The Mentalist. Always two steps ahead of Lee’s thinking and definitely a genius despite how he acts. Biff isn’t a gentle giant masking as a bully. He’s a sarcastic tough guy masking as a bully.
Now onto my favorite character the framed prank master himself, Lee Ping.  Lee is what we like to call the “straight man”, the character that plays normal to the wacky, mysterious crap that fluctuates throughout his life at school. Lee also is the audience’s frame of reference to all the weird crap that happens in A. Nigma and in doing so I feel he turns into one of the most realistic student characters ever.  Despite being part of a school, which even in reality is clique central, Lee couldn’t care less of being part of any clique even the popular clique. His only goals are to get good grades, talk to his love interest Tina Kwee (Lois Lane reference anyone?), and just hang out with his pals. I don’t know about all of you guys and gals but I couldn’t care less about cliques and popularity either which allows me to sympathize with him when Lee gets swept up in the popular crowd after he’s framed for the prank. Because really why wouldn’t you find the guy who covered you in puke and other crap cool? All Lee wants is to hang out with his friends but now he is forced to delph into the cliques of the school to find out who set him up which again leading back to the calculator DDR example leads to some hilarious shenanigans.
Nelvana, Detentionaire’s production company, who produced classics like Redwall and the Care Bears creates a flash based art style reminiscent of 6Teen but adding more of a grimy look to the backgrounds which creates a more mysterious, dingy feel to the series. There are only two major issues I have with the show’s animation. The first being its walk cycles. These walk cycles are just plain terrible with all their characters’ movements having the "flashy" look about them. The second thing and this is rather silly to notice but whenever the show does a close-up of Lee’s hands it, for some reason, becomes… this.
I mean come on seriously? This looks plain awful. It’s completely jarring to look at when the rest of the show is very clean. Overall I love this show. There are some definite low points of the show and some lazy flash animating tactics pulled in the show. But overall the characters are funny and take interesting spins on old clichés, the storyline is mysterious making you really want to know what happens next, and the animation overall is very immersive to the world of A.Nigma High. If you’re in Canada check it out on Teletoon sometime and if you’re in the U.S. or anywhere else in the world there are full episodes posted on youtube if you want to check it out. Now in the words of Detentionaire’s principal Barrage “DISMISSED!”
NEXT: Whyboy Spotlights... Renny The Fox

Illustrations by Jordan Tucker - Facebook Gallery

Written by: Taylor "Whyboy" Wyatt
or comment below
0 votes

Cartoon Corner: Crash Canyon Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 15 April 2012
in Video Reviews

We travel with Whyboy, Obnoxious and the newcomer Smolder the dragon to a land where animation is bland and repetitive, characters are mean spirited ass wipes, plots are bland, and plagiarism is basically there form of communication. Whyboy and co. have crashed into the land of Crash Canyon. ENJOY

Crash Canyon is Owned by Breakthrough Entertainment

http://cartooncornerwhyboy.blogspot.ca/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cartoon-Corner/198650010208211

...
0 votes

Whyboy Spotlights... The Blair Witch Project

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 05 April 2012
in Film Review
FIRST IMPRESSIONS

SPOTLIGHTED BY… Movie Doctorful

            Okay I gotta first start out by apologizing to Movie Doctorful. I was unable to watch The Blair Witch Project all the way through so this article you should consider more of a first impression of the movie rather than a full review of it. Usually I could be considered the biggest coward when it comes to horror movies. I would never willingly watch any sort of horror movie. Nowadays though as a writer and aspiring filmmaker I’ve been told it’s a good idea to try at least to watch every sort of movie mostly to expand my horizon of movies so I’ve started watching a few different horror movies recently like Insidious, Medium Raw, and Troll Hunter just to name a few. Unlike these movies though, Blair Witch is a psychological tension horror rather than Insidious where it’s just monsters popping out going “BOO!” 
            The Blair Witch Project, directed and written by Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez, is the story of three documentary filmmakers named Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard and Michael Williams (those are in fact their real names) and their disappearance while shooting a documentary on the Blair Witch legend in Burkittsville, Maryland. The three started off their little movie by talking to the local hicks in town, learning the disturbing events that surround the legend. From the banishment of the supposed Blair Witch, Elly Kedward, to the murder and disemboweling of a search party during the search of a missing person. The three then head into the woods to find evidence of the Blair Witch and this is when the shit hits the fan as the trio get themselves lost deep in the woods.
            Now the beginning of the movie was good for getting all the backstory of this legend out as quickly as possible and giving us a frame of reference to what happens to these three. Everything else after that shows off this movie’s true strength and that is uncomfortable psychological horror. This movie scares its audience by not what it shows like gore fests like the Saw franchise or by silly jump scares like Insidious but by how little it shows. An example of this (and this is kinda spoilery but really even when the movie starts you know this guy is dead meat) is when Heather and Mike wake up one morning to find Josh gone and in his place a bundle of twigs. Inside the bundle was a piece of Josh's shirt wrapped around hair and what appeared to be his teeth, all bloodied. We never see Josh get hurt, except for hearing what could be his screams of agony, but our imagination puts our minds on edge with the thought of “Oh No! If they got Josh they’ll come for them next.” In this movie it’s what you don’t see that freaks you out and incidentally this is where I couldn’t handle the tension and shut off the movie.  This tension building is helped by the very unique camera direction of the movie that unfortunately started one of the most sickening overused movie trends, what I call, SHAKY CAM.
            Yes. Shaky cam. We’ve all heard of it even those who’ve never watched a horror movie. After Blair Witch a whole avalanche of films came out capitalizing on the new hippest and coolest shooting style. Why? Well could it be because filmmakers wanted to take shaky cam and tinker around with it to experiment and show brand new experiences to their audience? Pff… No. Blair Witch with a recorded budget around $20,000 to $25,000 achieved a box office smash hit with a profit of around $248,639,099 worldwide. Those numbers sound PRETTY good to most directors and D.O.Ps (Director of Photography). I think we all know what shaky cam is but if you've been living under a rock for the past 20 years. Shaky cam is basically having all the action being viewed from the POV of a camera usually a film camera like in Blair Witch or Cloverfield. So, the main two hurdles people come across when putting shaky cam in there movie is implementing it so it adds to the feel in a positive fashion, and making the constant movement make sense in terms of the one holding the camera. On implementing a feel the shaky cam during the scenes where the trio is increasingly growing more and more crazy creates this uncomfortable atmosphere that compliments the movie’s style of horror to a great degree. As for the reason why Heather insists on recording everything even after they find weird twig figures in the woods and Josh disappears I'd say is competently put in at best. My theory is by the time the trio grows more crazy Heather becomes somewhat attached to the camera kinda like a security blanket. The camera basically being the only thing she feels will keep her from going completely insane. It's just a theory but I think it works.
            As for the characters I can say that they seem rather realistic while clearly definable. Heather is the bull-headed stubborn one, Mike is the voice of reason, and Josh is the most emotionally unstable of the group judging by how quickly he turned psycho. Also, with the shaky cam, well written dialogue, and the very empty setting, the characters bring this sense of inevitability to them and the movie(like the intro to the movie hadn’t already done) which makes their struggle to survive all the more tense and interesting.
            Overall this is a fantastic horror flick and definitely deserves all the praise it gets. Only those horror fans that get motion sick easily would probably not like this or the horror fans that want action 24/7 throughout the movie. For a good 20 minutes nothing really happens except for character development, which because it’s done properly is a plus in my books. I may go back someday to watch the entire movie but until then I’ll stick with animation.

NEXT: Whyboy Spotlights... ??????

Illustrations by Jordan Tucker - Facebook Gallery

Written by: Taylor "Whyboy" Wyatt


or comment below

Cartoon Corner: Pingu Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 01 April 2012
in Video Reviews


Well Since Harold got an Episode it's only fair that Vanilla gets one. Right? ENJOY

If anyone has any requests contact me at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

PREVIOUS EPISODE: The Drawn Together Movie: The Movie Review

PREVIOUS SPOTLIGHT: Cats Don't Dance

Whyboy Spotlights... Cats Don't Dance

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Saturday, 31 March 2012
in animated movie review
SPOTLIGHTED BY Galo N.

Cats. What would life be without cats? Well half of youtube would seize to exist, writers would stop demonizing them in almost every comedy movie and cartoon, and we wouldn’t have Turner Entertainment’s first and last film Cat’s Don’t Dance before getting they’re company absorbed into Warner Bros. Animation. The story goes like this the bright-eyed dreamer Danny from the small town of Kokomo, Indiana, played by Scott Bakula, leaves home to head to Hollywood to obtain his dreams of starring in the movies. When he reaches Hollywood he meets a rag tag team of animal actors including his love interest Sawyer, played by Jasmine Guy, and gets a job working on the latest Darla Dimple picture. Mayhem ensues as Danny takes his quest to make himself and his fellow animals Hollywood stars by showing their audience and the film industry that, in fact, they can dance.
Now the story overall is fairly simple but does have this coat of depth to it. This would probably go unnoticed to most kids but the whole movie is tangentially teaching everyone who watches it decades worth of film history. Let’s start off with the most obvious example of how this movie tangentially teaches everyone through its sheer amount of caricature characters. Can you name every single famous actor/director that this movie shows? Here's just a few.
Laurel & Hardy
Mae West
Louis B. Mayer 
Named in this L.B. Mammoth

It is quite ingenious showing kids all these famous film icons through this mostly cameo style and just not jamming it down our throats but showing enough that our interest in them makes us curious want to find out more. The next bit of tangential learning that this movie shows us is through the story itself and it’s exactly what you think it is. Minorities would go to auditions and casting calls like the one’s shown here and be given roles based solely that they were black, Hispanic, a women or whatever and when they were being filmed they got very small roles like Danny.
Overall as a tangential learning tool Cat’s Don’t Dance is a very intelligent movie but the movie suffers a little bit because of how much it loves it’s film references and tangential topics. All the side characters in the movie, T.W. Turtle, Cranston Goat, Frances the fish, Wollie Mammoth and Tillie Hippo, are all underdeveloped ending in me not caring one little bit on whether they have their dreams come true or not but when I say underdeveloped I don’t mean they are bland or stereotypes. Unlike the Open Season characters, that have only one joke to them and nothing else, these characters actually have some interesting aspects to them like how Tillie is constantly playing matchmaker for characters, the sort of second personality of T.W. when he sings, and even the seemingly romantic relationship of Cranston and Frances is interesting. If these characters got a little more time to interact with Danny on screen I feel they could have been all very memorable characters. We see it can work like with Woolie Mammoth’s scene where he talks about his woes of doing the company production logo at the beginning of movies.
Also, he's played by John Reyes Davies so that helps a bit.

Now onto the main leads of the movie Danny and Sawyer. Sawyer is a very good antagonizing love interest for Danny, counteracting Danny’s bright-eyed optimism with her realistic pessimism. This contrast in personality does create believable conflict. Bottom line for Sawyer’s character I feel she is a great character but her voice actress is a different story. During research I found that Turner Entertainment had several actresses audition for the role of Sawyer, but there was a lot of indecision that led to many scenes being animated for different actresses. Jasmine Guy was chosen to play Sawyer when the movie was 90% complete. The original voice actress chosen for the character (never was specified who it was) had a much deeper voice which resulted in a noticeable contrast of tones between Jasmine Guy's voice and Sawyer’s singing voice Natalie Cole. I can simply say I love Natalie Cole’s singing in Cat’s Don’t Dance. She is able to bring so much energy and passion into all her singing performances in the movie. This however creates the awkwardness when during the transition between the two actresses voices (Jasmine Guy’s and Natalie Cole’s) there was an extremely distracting tonal shift that made me scratch my head numerous times. If they had stuck with the more deeper voice actress that tonal shift wouldn’t have been as distracting.
Now onto Danny! He’s dull. Yes I said that the contrasting personalities between Danny and Sawyer were great. The contrast is great, and Sawyer’s personality is great but Danny’s personality is not great. Below average would be how I describe it. This could have been more to the fact that we are introduced to Danny through one of the most generic songs “Danny's Arrival Song,” you can just see the creativity is just beaming from that title, done by the king of generic himself Randy Newman. The only thing I remember of that song was the visuals, which were fantastic. Everything else is just a smudge on my memory. The song does state everything you need to know about Danny but that’s the thing what it states is just a generic hero. Danny like I said is the optimistic bright-eyed dreamer nothing more nothing less. This character isn’t bad but it has been done to death in countless movies. There is nothing new that Danny brings to the table that twelve other movies haven’t already brought but even generic Danny is still likeable. He's just the least memorable of the bunch.
But now onto the most memorable characters of the movie, the villains, Darla Dimple and her humongous bodyguard Max. First off Darla Dimple is a great reference to Shirley Temple and Darla Hood respectively taking the look from Shirley and the name from Darla, who were both huge child actors from the 1930s. Next Darla is a very fun but brutal character with her split personality. On one side she’s the darling miss Darla Dimple lover of all things and America’s sweetheart and on the other side Cruella De Ville’s evil hell spawn. The difference between these sides is spotlighted during her fantastic villian song “Big & Loud.” First starting off like this…
And ending with this…
Darla Dimple is definitely the highlight of the movie. Her bodyguard Max… well I just like his running joke of being this huge lumbering laviathan but doing almost everything in the most delicate of fashions. 
Hilarious.

Finally the songs are mixed but all are made even better with the movies fantastic visuals.
Danny’s Arrival Song
Big & Loud
Nothing’s Gonna Stop Us Now (Especially This Song)

The visuals along are worth the price to get this movie. Everything in this movie just “pops” out and is easily distinguishable and memorable even though the characters themselves aren’t. Also, has there been any other movie where the color pink is shown as threatening? None that I can think of. Cats Don’t Dance overall is a decent movie that sacrificed character development for more film history references. If they had put the exact amount of effort they did for film history references to character development then I’m sure this movie would be an animated classic. 

NEXT: Whyboy Spotlights... Blair Witch Project/Troll Hunter

Illustrations by Jordan Tucker - Facebook Gallery

Written by: Taylor "Whyboy" Wyatt

Whyboy Spotlights... Horton Hears a Who (2008)

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 22 March 2012
in animated movie review


SPOTLIGHTED BY Les of Manic Expression

After rewatching this movie I can really tell that this movie deserves a Cartoon Corner review of its own. Not because it's bad but because it would be very interesting to compare the 2008 movie to the 1970 animated short as well as the original 1952 book. Obviously by that you can already deduce that I really liked this movie and I feel that it fully deserves the title of best Dr. Seuss movie adaptation which when you think about it isn't that much of an accomplishment.

Anyway onto the story which is mainly just given away in the title. Horton the elephant hears a Who. Simple. Straight forward. Nothing that the 1970 short hadn't already pulled off so how does  the 2008 movie differentiate itself because. Well first off it changes the two main characters personalities that being Horton and the Who Horton comes in contact with. Let's start with who's character obviously changed the most that being Horton who in this movie is played by the comedic master Jim Carrey. I love Jim Carrey in almost all his roles. He just has tons of fun in any role that he plays to an almost worrying degree. This however was a major pitfall that Carrey fell into when he previously played The Grinch in the 2000 only decent adaptation of How The Grinch Stole Christmas. The movie was fine in it's own right it added plot elements that quite frankly contradicted the message of the story but the main saving grace of the movie was Jim Carrey but even then he only saved it because he's naturally funny. It wasn't the fact that he was a good Grinch. In my own words he missed the point of the character so bad he wasn't even in the same country as it. The cold heartless mean spirited Grinch was gone and replaced with the mugging hyperactive green asshole that we saw on screen.

Some of these points can be used again when describing Horton's character. While in the short he was just a polite and kind everyman saving the Who's because that was the right thing to do in the movie he constantly mugs at the camera, spazzes out, and would be considered insane in every meaning of the word. This change however... works. This will probably get me spat upon on the streets but the Horton in the book and the short were just bland. They were both nice guys but being just a nice guy is boring for people to spend an hour and a half watching. Carrey brings new life to the character which makes the character interesting to watch and Carrey does bring a lot of the big laughs in the movie. But Carrey as shown in performances like in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind can play serious as well and when the mood goes low Carrey can work with it bringing his charm to the moment that makes even the sadder of scenes a joy to watch.

Now onto the second of this double act the Who. In the adaptation he was a simple minded professor looking for knowledge vastly beyond his own comprehension and again while his character held up for a short most would DEFINITELY find him dull if the same character was stretched in this movie. So now he's a eccentric mayor played by Steve Carrell. I didn't really know what to make of that. I'm one who never found Steve all that funny in most his roles mainly because he downplayed his reactions and performance but here he is just going above my expectations. Great reactions and a truly fun filled performance.

...

Whyboy Spotlights... Vertigo

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 15 March 2012
in Film Review


*THIS SPOTLIGHT WAS WRITTEN FOR A FILM HISTORY CLASS SO THERE ARE SPOILERS TO THE MAX. IF YOU WANT TO WATCH THE MOVIE AND DON'T WANT TO BE SPOILED DO NOT READ THIS SPOTLIGHT*

          If Alfred Hitchcock were to have dropped dead in 1959 he would still have been known as one of the greatest directors in film history. Directing classics like The 39 Steps (1935), The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934) as well as the 1956 remake, Notorious (1946), Strangers on a Train (1951), Dial M for Murder (1954), Rear Window (1954) and today’s topic Vertigo (1958). Hitchcock’s Vertigo is based on the french novel D’Entre les Morts by Pierre Boileau and Thomas Narcejac which held a mixture of many genres that he loved to delve into much like his previous movies, genres including detective mystery, thriller, romance and horror. Hitchcock luckily was able to get the rights to D’Entre les Morts unlike the last time he dealt with Boileau and Narcejac. Alfred Hitchcock missed out on purchasing the rights to the Boileau and Narcejac first novel, Celle qui n'était plus, by just a few hours, Véra Clouzot a Brazilian-born French film actress and screenwriter having gotten to the authors first. Véra took the book and made Les Diaboliques that in 2007 was listed as one of the top 25 horror films on Time magazine.
From Les Diaboliques
Hitchcock managed to buy the next book, E’Entre les Morts, so now Hitchcock needed someone to write the screenplay. Hitchcock first hired screenwriter Maxwell Anderson who wrote the screenplay for such films like Death Takes a Holiday (1934) and adaptations like We Live Again (1934), which was an adaptation of Leo Tolstoy’s Resurrection. Unfortunately, Hitchcock rejected his script that was entitled Listen Darkling. He then moved onto Alec Coppel who wrote the screenplay for Obsession (1949), Brass Monkey (1948), and Woman Hater (1948) but was still dissatisfied by the script. It wasn’t until Hitchcock was recommended Samuel A. Taylor, a Golden Globe awarded screenwriter, and got a script he was proud of. Unfortunately, Alec Coppel complained to the Screen Writers Guild because Taylor was taking sole credit for the screenplay. Thus ending in both Coppel and Taylor with co-writer credits.
Vertigo starred a Hitchcock movie veteran, James Stewert, and newcomer Kim Novak who was in fact not Hitchcock’s first choice for her role in the movie. Originally Hitchcock wanted Vera Miles to play the character of Madeline/Judy, the duo role of playing both a suicidal housewife and the busybody everyday worker girl, but became pregnant before the shooting so she had to be replaced by Kim Novak. Ironically, Novak had to complete quite a lot of pre-filming commitments as well as take a mandated vacation given to her by Paramount Pictures and by then Miles had her child and was available to act in the movie. Nevertheless, Hitchcock decided to go with Novak.
It is said that with truly great art must come truly great suffering. During pre-production of Vertigo Hitchcock was diagnosed with a hernia and spent the first night of his life in hospital. Two months later he was back in hospital for kidney stones. Another saying is that behind every great man is an even greater woman. In Hitchcock’s case this woman was his wife, Alma Hitchcock. Near the completion of the film Alma, his soul mate and muse, was diagnosed with cancer; this sent Hitchcock into a spell of hysteria. A man who so famously feared losing control had found the person he loved the most in a position he was powerless to help. This period in his life greatly affected several themes in Vertigo.
Finally onto actually looking at the actual movie Vertigo. Vertigo is the tale of detective John “Scottie” Fergueson who suffers from acrophobia, which is the fear of heights. The opening of a film is conventionally the first method of structuring a work. Hitchcock uses it spectacularly himself in Rear Window; The camera glides into an apartment, past various visual indicators, such as ornaments and photographs that expose aspects of the occupants' life. The camera finally comes to rest on a sleeping James Stewart, constricted by a leg cast and confined to a wheelchair. This opening scene provides the viewer with all the necessary information about the protagonist, his character, his career, his environment, and his current predicament. The opening title sequence of Vertigo however does none of this. We first see a woman we don't know who she is or where we are. This woman isn't Kim Novak and in fact we never see her again. We fall into her eye and then into a series of spirals. There is no direction or stability here; the colors don't match; only the motif of the spiral is constant.
We are then introduced to Scottie as he fails in an attempt to catch somebody because of his own inability to jump due to suffering from Vertigo. He is then responsible for the death of a police officer that saves his life. We see more of the theme of the spiral, here with the use of the tracking in, dolly out 'vertigo' shot. This shot occurs seven times throughout the film and is also a structuring motif. It is the visual approximation of the mind and body of Scottie and shows a perception problem. It was a new type of point of view shot. Irmin Roberts, a Paramount second-unit cameraman developed this shot. By zooming in and pulling out the camera it creates an unsettling in-camera effect that appears to undermine normal visual perception. This technique goes by many names; the "Hitchcock zoom" or the "Vertigo effect"; "Hitchcock shot" or "Vertigo shot"; the "Smash Zoom" or "Smash Shot"; the "Jaws shot"; A "zolly"; the Trombone Effect and many other names but the technical term for this shot is the dolly zoom. It represents ambiguous feelings of attraction and repulsion, which are our feelings towards the characters, the feelings of Judy and Scottie; Madeleine and the grave; Madeleine and Scottie; Carlata and her child; and Elster and Madeleine.
The scene ends leaving Scottie hanging for his life and we pick the movie up at his ex-fiancée Midge’s apartment played by Barbara Bel Geddes; we are never shown how Scottie got off the roof. This happens a number of times throughout the film, though the two most pronounced stops are after the two main deaths. Some people have complained that because of this the film is unbelievable or that it makes no sense. Although Hitchcock didn't explain everything that happened in his films they were never unbelievable. For instance he often relayed on chance happenings to begin the plot, most clearly in Strangers on a Train. Here I think Hitchcock creates a dreamlike feel. We've all had dreams where things move forward even though they aren't fully explained. You wake up and think hang on a minute that doesn't work. This is further emphasized by the look of the film. Hitchcock uses a number of different lens, diffusions, green hues, fogs, filters, and various densities to achieve Vertigo's look.
Scottie having decided to retire not wanting his Vertigo to hurt anyone else but he is then talked into one last case by his old acquaintance Gavin Elster played by Tom Helmore. Elster wants Scottie to tail his wife because he has reason to believe that his wife, Madeline, has been possessed. Although very skeptical that his wife is actually possessed Scottie takes the job and begins to trail Madeline to everywhere she goes. As he follows Madeline through museums, graveyards, and forest haunts Scottie becomes obsessed with this phantom woman who apparently believes herself to be the reincarnation of a turn-of-the-century belle named Carlotta. Visually Hitchcock reinforces this loss of objectivity and descent into obsession by photographing Scottie's wanderings in soft-focus and at a gliding, dreamlike pace. In the scenes of Scottie tailing Madeleine by car through the streets of San Francisco, the vehicle seems to be floating above the pavement. This feeling is enhanced even more by the lilting, musical background of master film composer Bernard Herrmann. With the growth of Scottie's obsession comes an equal and concurrent increase in the credibility of Madeleine's claims. Her appearance, her strange visits to places that Carlotta frequented, and her speech in the middle of the film all seemed to confirm her belief that she was the reincarnated Carlotta.
Scottie continues his obsessive stalking of Madeline until she attempts suicide when she jumps into the San Francisco Bay. The obsessive romance between the two now comes face to face. Scottie continues to follow her to his house and they decide to spend the day together because Scottie fears Madeleine might commit suicide. The two travel to Muir Woods where Madeleine, embarrassed from confessing that her dreams sound mad, runs to the ocean and they kiss. Upon hearing the details of her nightmares Scottie identifies the setting as Mission San Juan Bautista. Scottie takes Madeleine there where they proclaim their love for each other. But love truly shatters when Madeline runs up to the bell tower in hopes to end her life. Due to Scottie’s vertigo he is unable to reach the top and Madeline plummets to her death.
Scottie after Madeline’s death being labeled a suicide goes into a deep depression, suffering from hellish dreams that are showcased through painter John Ferren’s spiral pattern visuals.  While treated in a sanatorium, he becomes mute, haunted by vivid nightmares and although Midge visits, his condition remains the same. After release, Scottie haunts the places that Madeleine visited, often imagining that he sees her spotting several Madeline look-a-likes. Hitchcock actually used his dream theme to great effect here as well. By throwing Kim Novak into scenes and pulling the camera very far back Hitchcock would have Novak removed from the scene and replaced with one of the many look-a-likes to make Scottie look even more insane then he already seemed. One day, he spots a woman who reminds him of Madeleine. Scottie follows the woman to her hotel room where she identifies herself as Judy Barton from Kansas. Though initially suspicious and defensive, Judy eventually agrees to join Scottie for dinner.
After Scottie leaves Judy has a flashback revealing she was, in fact, the woman known as "Madeleine," but she is not Gavin's wife. Judy writes a confession letter to Scottie explaining she was an accomplice to the real Madeleine Elster's murder by Gavin, and how Gavin had taken advantage of Scottie's acrophobia. Originally Hitchcock was unsure whether to keep the "letter writing scene" or not. He decided to remove it but Herbert Coleman, Vertigo's associate producer and a frequent collaborator with Hitchcock, felt the removal was a mistake. However, Hitchcock said, "Release it just like that." James Stewart agreed with Hitchcock and said to Coleman "Herbie, you shouldn't get so upset with Hitch. The picture's not that important." When the head of Paramount, Barney Balaban received news of the edits he was very vocal about the edits and ordered Hitchcock to "Put the picture back the way it was." As a result, the "letter writing scene" remained in the final film. Scottie starts to transform Judy into Madeline as he changes the clothing she wears and even dies her hair blonde all to keep the image of the past ghost alive. Hitchcock had a dramatic preference for blonde women, stating that the audience would be more suspicious of a brunette. Many of these blondes were of the Grace Kelly variety: perfect, aloof ice goddesses, who also have a hidden red-hot inner fire. One of Hitchcock's earliest films, The Lodger (1927), featured a serial killer who stalks blonde women. Blonde actress Anny Ondra famously starred in Hitchcock's first sound film Blackmail (1929). Hitchcock said he used blonde actresses in his films, not because of an attraction to them, but because of a tradition that began with silent star Mary Pickford. The director said that blondes were "a symbol of the heroine". He also thought they photographed better in black and white, which was the predominant film for most dramas for many years.
Scottie realizes the truth that Judy and Madeine are the same person when Judy wears a unique necklace that he saw in the portrait of Carlotta Valdes and in turn worn by Madeline. Instead of dinner, Scottie insists on taking Judy to the Mission San Juan Bautista, the site of Madeline’s supposed death. There, he reveals that he wants to reenact the event that led to his madness, admitting that he now knows Madeleine and Judy are the same. Scottie forces her up the bell tower and angrily presses Judy to admit her deceit. Scottie reaches the top, conquering his acrophobia at last. Judy confesses that Gavin had hired her to pose as a possessed Madeleine; Gavin faked the suicide by tossing the body of his already-murdered wife from the bell tower.
This is where Vertigo shows a little age in its story. Much like a lot of old movies certain plot points become sillier as time goes on. In Vertigo, the final twist ending is that a nun pops out of nowhere in the clock tower which scares Judy so badly she accidentally runs off the tower dropping to her death. The nun then quickly rings the bell and runs away probably to Mexico considering what just happened could be considered man slaughter. The ending just seems like it was pulled out of nowhere because Hitchcock couldn’t figure out how to end with the love interest dead and make it ironically profound. Actually there is a way to make this scene less goofy if only slightly have the nun on a lower floor ring the bell and the ringing is so loud it scares Judy and she then falls to her death. The music and the sound of the bell ringing would have made this scene a little more profound. As it stands the ending scene can be shortened to the phrase “Oops-e-doodles.” Hitchcock even had an idea for an alternate ending where that showed Midge listening to a radio report of Gavin Elster's capture in Europe. When Scottie enters, she switches the radio off. They share a drink and look out of the window in silence. The original ending may have been goofy but this alternate ending would have killed the momentum of Judy’s death. An old saying once said that you should always end on a high note and despite the goofiness Vertigo ends on a truly dramatic and profound note.
Boo!
Vertigo during its primary release in San Francisco on May 9, 1958 where it received mixed reviews and its performance at the box office was average receiving on around 3 million dollars on the initial release which barely paid for their budget of $2,479,000. I can see why this movie wouldn’t have done great at the time. For Hitchcock fans at the time this story diverts from the romantic thriller storyline to more mystery even though the mystery is solved with 1/3 of the movie still remaining. The music by Bernard Herrmann who has done film scores for such films like Citizen Kane shows his mastery of music as he gives the movie the dream-like edge that enforces the theme of spirals and dreaming. Some of the music in fact shows up in the recent masterpiece The Artist showing us the timeless quality of Herrmann’s work. Vertigo is a very good movie but I’m hesitant to call it a masterpiece. The characters are well rounded and interesting all conveying ambiguity in their characters which made them all have a sense of mystery but some characters drop off the face of the earth in the middle of the movie not getting any form of proper send off despite how enjoyable their characters were. The story has also aged rather disjointedly. The biggest two glaring issues from this are the appearing nun ending and Scottie’s actual tailing. Last time I checked if you wanted to tail someone in a car you need to be farther then 3 feet away in your car. When Scottie is trailing her at the museum and apartments at least he’s a little ways off so it’s more believable that Madeline couldn’t see him but in the car he might as well put a flashing siren on top of his hood if he wanted to be subtler. I guess this goes with the theme of dreams but it seems rather backwards to sacrifice a believable story to convey some sort of message when really a storyteller’s first priority is telling the story. Vertigo is a good aged romantic mystery thriller with a few story hiccups that would make the audience scratch their heads but fortunately not stop the film.


NEXT TIME: Whyboy Spotlights... Horton Hears a Who

Illustrations by Jordan Tucker - Facebook Gallery

Written by: Taylor "Whyboy" Wyatt


Whyboy Spotlights... The Lorax

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 08 March 2012
in animated movie review
Hello all. I am a reviewer and I speak for the movies. The Lorax was a difficult film oh yes but that wasn’t because that I didn’t think it was worst then the rest. Okay gonna stop rhyming if you can even call that last line a rhyme. Anyway, just a personal story but I had many problems seeing this movie mostly due to a lot of work piling up at college that I had to get done this weekend. So, I couldn’t see The Lorax last weekend which through my schedule for a loop. Thus I ended up going to The Lorax by myself after school and it was a very enjoyable experience. When by myself as well as watching the movie I was able to really see the reactions that the audience was having to The Lorax and they enjoyed it.
That just freaks me out.
First a recap of all the crap The Lorax movie had to push through before it even went on screen. The one main thing is that Danny Devito was playing the Lorax and everyone thought he would play the role like he did in Hercules as Phil. You know how he played basically himself nut a centaur. Then there was Zac Efron as the boy, Ed Helms as the Once-Ler and Taylor Swift as… the love interest. Everyone on the internet was screeching their throats off ranting that none of these actors would be good as these characters especially Danny.
So, here’s the story (like you really need me to restate it), in the town of Thneedville no tree ever grows in fact anything plant related is made of plastic and fresh air needs to be bought from the company running the city Hare Air. In the middle of all this is Zac Efron, playing… a totally interchangeable character, is trying to put the moves on Audrey played by Taylor Swift. Also, just to add if Zac’s character is interchangeable then Taylor Swift’s character is completely forgettable and stock. Anyway, Audrey dreams of seeing a Truffula tree and like the pubescent mind dreams if you bring the girl what she wants you get a kiss. Zac, with the help of his grandmother played by Betty White, gets out of the city to see the Once-Ler played by Ed Helms. A man Granny White says that knows what happened to all the tress and after that you can pretty much sing the rest of the movie despite a few “Despicable Me”-bits and the Zac Efron plotline… NAH you can totally sing those parts too especially the Zac Efron plot line.
The plot around Zac is entirely standard not deviating at all from “Boy see wise person. Boy learn lesson.  Boy beats corporate suit. Boy save day.” Even the corporate suit villain isn’t even a fun villain. Mr. O’hare played by Rob Riggle is a very translucent villain who earns money by selling the people of Thneedville fresh air for money that creates the plot-hole where does O’Hare get the clean air if the air around Thneedville is all polluted. But honestly no one is there to watch Zac Efron’s side o the story and you aren’t here to read about that either. So, how does Danny Devito play the Lorax and Ed Helms play the Onceler?
Let me first say that none of the Dr. Seuss movie adaptations have ever got the main character right. In The Cat in the Hat, Mike Myers played an insufferable idiot who makes unfunny pop cultural jokes and sexual innuendos instead of a slightly sophisticated goofball. In How The Grinch Stole Christmas, Jim Carrey played an over emotional mugging prankster nothing like Dr. Seuss’s Grinch who was cold and heartless and wouldn’t sound happy even if he was laughing with glee. Now onto The Lorax, the two iconic characters namely the Lorax and the Onceler. Like everyone called out Danny Devito played Danny Devito not the peacekeeper Lorax and Ed Helms takes the Onceler character in an entirely new direction making him more of a naïve kid rather than a greedy faceless business man. There are gonna be A LOT of critics who say that changing the characters this much ruins any sort of connection with the original story and muddies up the actually darker more serious tone of the story and they are right.
The Lorax is an awful adaptation of the Dr. Seuss book. That’s just simple fact. The tone of the movie is light hearted and cutesy which ruins the impact of the environmental message, Danny and Ed the way they are playing their respective characters mostly miss the original point of the original characters, and this movie also falls into the “ADD 3D TO MAKE IT LOOK KEWL” trap. All and all The Lorax is a terrible adaptation of Dr. Seuss’s book but really what did we all expect? Did we expect the movie to be exactly like the book or even the short? I stopped expecting such things when I saw The Cat in the Hat in a coconut bikini.
I based my opinion on The Lorax as just a stand-alone movie because as I said as an adaptation it sucks big time but as a stand-alone movie I would say it’s competent but very weak in every story telling aspect. First back to the characters, Lorax is a gruff and annoying peacekeeper not having much censor for what he spouts out his mouth. Ed Helms’s Onceler is now a naïve kid trying to survive in the world of business. His character is actually a lot of fun much like Carrey’s Grinch and throughout his company expanding (done through a mildly irritating song sequence and brought on by the most contrived of reasoning) the Onceler does start to act like The Onceler from the book but this is a different Onceler. This Onceler conveys how business can transform someone into doing awful things. Also, a quick note on the musical numbers, the music is competent but generic you won’t remember a single song from this movie after the credits role except maybe the Onceler’s song “How Bad Can I Be?”
Now time to mention the side characters because quite frankly they take up so much screen time they could be considered main characters. As most of you undoubtedly know The Lorax was created by Illumination Entertainment the same people who did Despicable Me a movie which I loved for two reasons, the anti-hero Gru and villain were both a lot of fun and the minions. The minions from Despicable Me are becoming more and more iconic mascots of their company and they have seeped there way into The Lorax or to put it more simply. The Swomee Swans, Bar-ba-loots, and the Humming-Fish are just the Despicable Me minions in disguise. Most of the time when the crowd laughed is was during when these characters did a minion-esque joke which isn’t undeserved I loved the side characters conveying so much emotion without speaking single world (well except for making noises but no words) is so much more powerful then just having them plainly laugh, cry or whatever.
Now overall how did I like the Lorax? The whole Zac Efron side of the story is very bland and stock not at all interesting. The Lorax isn’t the Lorax. Neither is the Onceler. There is pointless 3D.The environmental message of the story is less potent now that this movie gave the Onceler a happy ending where we see his face. Take what you want from that. But the humor is cute, the Onceler and Lorax while not the same as the book do have a good chemistry that makes me start to see the original book’s heart somewhere in all this. Much like how I could see the heart of the story in The Grinch. Overall The Lorax is a very competent standard animated film, with beautiful animation, some fun characters (even the very stock granny character that Betty White plays is a little fun) and a simple happy ending. It’s just a simple animated movie.
NEXT TIME: Whyboy Spotlights... Alfred Hitchcock's Vertigo
Illustrations by Jordan Tucker - Deviant Art Account 

Written by: Taylor "Whyboy" Wyatt

If you have any requests for a movie or show to spotlight please contact me at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Cartoon Corner: The Drawn Together Movie: The Movie Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 07 March 2012
in animated movie review

While Whyboy is away harold takes the reins and reviews one of the most insane movies of all time... but then he got lazy and chose The Drawn Together Movie: The Movie. ENJOY

Title Card by Jordan Tucker

Jordan Tucker's Deviantart Account http://highinheaven.deviantart.com

...

Whyboy Spotlights... The Triplets of Belleville

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 01 March 2012
in animated movie review

 

Rating 94%

...

Whyboy Talks about The Lorax

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Saturday, 25 February 2012
in Thoughts

God damn it. I'm SO frustrated. *sigh* As you all know The Lorax will be hitting theatres soon and I've been wracking my brain trying to figure out why god why do I think that this movie will do decently? I'm probably a single man minority in this case but I feel that The Lorax won't be as bad as everyone says it will be. I've seen all the trailers and I groan every time because the story and characters shown in them seem rather bland and annoying but I still can't say I'm not looking forward to this movie. The only thing that I can fathom as an explanation for this is just that it's The Lorax. A children's book that undoubtedly most of us all grew up with myself included. The Lorax was very mature for what it was and had a surpassingly smart way of showing the villain of the scenario and how it transformed the villain into the cold, empty vessel that is now telling the boy the story. 

It's like with the live action How the Grinch Stole Christmas. Even though Carrey in my opinion botched playing "The Grinch" biiiiiiiig time, and coming off as nothing like the Grinch at all, the original story still shined through capturing people claiming it the spot of guilty pleasure. When the story is actually pre-defined the Dr. Seuss adaptation is alright like How the Grinch Stole Christmas and Horton Hears a Who. It's only when the story is non-existent it has problems and I'm talking to you Cat in The Hat. The movies based off properties like Cat in the Hat just have no idea how to add material to the movie. The creators seeming reflex is to play to the lower common denominator by adding all the supposed "hip" things kids like. Which if you've seen my Cat in The hat review you should know is WRONG. 

Okay final words... The Lorax movie as of right now judging by the trailers looks... ugh... obviously. The actors have all been ripped to shreds mainly Dani Devito on how horribly cast these roles are and I give that to yah as well. Dani's gonna have to have worked hard to make us feel he is a suitable Lorax. But even after all this I'm still gonna probably foolishly place a little faith in the makers. Hopeful that they grew up with this book and crae about it enough to make something actually decent with this. But if it blows chunks I'm gonna tear it apart like I would any movie no question about that >:) Thanks for letting me get that off my chest and a special thanks to Stephen Krosecz of Animated Analysis who unknowingly made me kick off this little rant.

...

Whyboy Spotlights... The Secret World of Arrietty

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 22 February 2012
in animated movie review

Oh joyous day! As an animation nut as I am I love the Studio Ghibli films. From masterpieces like Castle in the Sky to films I found decent like Only Yesterday. I found that I’ve never been let down by Studio Ghibli. Unfortunately though I’ve never had the chance to see one of these great movies in theaters until now. The Secret of Arrietty was among the films I had to see this year alongside The Pirates and (I know I’ll get a lot of crap for saying this) The Lorax. But how did The Secret live up to my expectations.
As most of you have heard The Secret of Arrietty is based of Mary Norton’s The Borrowers series of books and that leads to the plot having to work fairly harder to distinguish itself from the dozens of Borrowers inspired books, TV shows, and movies and from where I stand it really doesn’t stray far from them but surprisingly it doesn't come off as derivative. Shaun a boy about to have a heart operation goes to his mother’s old summer home to find some rest and relaxation. It isn’t long before he finds and accidentally puts in danger the small new borrower Arrietty, a courageous girl, who is trying to cope with her new role of being a borrower. If I gave any more of a plot summary and I’d be spoiling the plot so I’ll leave it at that.

...

Cartoon Corner: Tiny Robots Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 12 February 2012
in animated movie review

*BOREDOM AND PLAGIARISM* = VIDEO BRIQUENDO'S FIRST IN THE LINE OF SHAMEFUL MOVIES THEY FEEL SORRY FOR MAKING. Enjoy

PREVIOUS REVIEW: EPISODE 20 - The Legend of Frosty The Snowman Review

Title Card by Jordan Tucker

...
0 votes

Whyboy Spotlights... War Horse

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 22 January 2012
in Movies

Today Whyboy Spotlights the new Steven Spielberg World War 1 flick based around the most magestic of all creatures. HORSES!!! Enjoy.

War Horse is Owned by Dreamworks SKG

LAST WHYBOY SPOTLIGHTS... The Wolfman (2010) Remake

Jordan Tucker's Deviantart Account http://highinheaven.deviantart.com

...
0 votes

Whyboy Spotlights... The Wolfman (2010) Remake

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 17 January 2012
in Film Review

Whyboy takes a look at the 2010 remake of the 1941 Classic Horror movie, The Wolfman.

The Cartoon Corner Blog

Youtuble Channel

Follow me on Twitter @CartoonCornerWB

...
0 votes

Cartoon Corner: The Legend of Frosty The Snowman Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Friday, 06 January 2012
in animated movie review

A Review Created for RED RIBBON REVIEWERS

Whyboy's Christmas bitchings set their rage on the snow Turd of a movie itself The Legend of Frosty the Snowman. ENJOY

Go to Red Ribbon Reviewers HERE to see the rest of the Entries

...

Gaming Alley: Eternal Darkness - Sanity's Requiem Part 9

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Saturday, 03 December 2011
in Video Games

Cartoon Corner: Top 12 Saddest Disney Moments

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 01 December 2011
in Top # Lists

In Celebration of the company that traumatized all of us at such a young age, Cartoon Corner presents a 40 MINUTE TOP 12 SADDEST DISNEY MOMENTS LIST.... Painful memories shall ensue. ENJOY

Title Card by Jordan Tucker

...
0 votes

Gaming Alley: Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem Part 8

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 29 November 2011
in Video Games

Alex & The Bust
Time to TOTALLY defuse the freak out factor of the bust in the 2nd floor Hallway. ENJOY

PREVIOUS EPISODE Part 7 - Anthony The Monk Killer

Gaming Alley: Eternal Darkness Youtube Playlist [CLICK HERE]

Eternal Darkness is owned by Silicon Knights

Title Cards by Jordan Tucker
http://highinheaven.deviantart.com/

Blog: http://cartooncornerwhyboy.blogspot.com/
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/TaylorwyattWhyboy/
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cartoon-Corner/198650010208211
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/CartoonCornerWB

0 votes

Gaming Alley: Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem Part 7

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Saturday, 19 November 2011
in Video Games

Anthony The Monk KIller

Oh I'm definitely going to hell for what I do here? ENJOY

LAST EPISODE: Part 6 - Anthony The Pot Collector

Gaming Alley: Eternal Darkness Youtube Playlist [CLICK HERE]

...
0 votes

The Garbage Pail Kids Animated Series Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Monday, 14 November 2011
in Video Reviews

And I Thought Where's My Mummy was Boring and Uncreative. ENJOY

The Garbage Pail Kids Animated Series is Owned by CBS

Title Card by Jordan Tucker

If you have any requests for a future review or Gaming Alley contact me at   This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  

...

Gaming Alley: Eternal Darkness - Sanity's Requiem Part 5

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 08 November 2011
in Video Games

Anthony The Messenger

Now in our quest to fight the darkness we face to ask that if being bored is blasphemous enough for death what will happen if you read someone's mail? ENJOY

Eternal Darkness is owned by Silicon Knights

Title Cards by Jordan Tucker

...
0 votes

Gaming Alley: Mickey's Magical Mirror Part 13 - THE MAGICAL FINALE

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 06 November 2011
in Video Games

Time to End this Magical Adventure

Mickey's Magical Mirror is owned by Capcom

You can check out the rest of the Mickey's Magical Mirror Gaming Alley HERE:

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6496144156B47B7A&feature=viewall

...
0 votes

Cartoon Corner: Scooby Doo in Where's My Mummy? Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Monday, 31 October 2011
in animated movie review

Time for another Scooby Dooby Doo! Review for Halloween! Last year I reviewed a Scooby-Doo Show that pissed me off and this year I review a Scooby-Doo Movie that completly destroyed my expectations ina VERY bad way. ENJOY.

Scooby-Doo In Where's My Mummy? is Owned by Hanna Barbera Productions

If you have any requests for a future review or Gaming Alley contact me at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  

Blog

...
0 votes

Gaming Alley: Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem Part 2-4

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Friday, 21 October 2011
in Video Games

Part 2 - Pious The Corrupted

Time for the First stop in this tale of Insanity and Darkness as we meet our Persian Spartan Pious face the Darkness. Will he Succeed? Well he turns into the main Antagonist so...No. 

Part 3 - Ellia The Bored

...

Gaming Alley: Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem PART 1

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 19 October 2011
in Video Games

Enter The Darkness

For another Pre-Halloween Treat Whyboy begins his trip into Insanity and this has nothing to do with a Crappy ass cartoon. HOORAY. Now delph into the madness simply known as Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem.

Eternal Darkness is owned by Silicon Knights

Title Cards by Jordan Tucker
http://highinheaven.deviantart.com/

If you have any requests for a future review or Gaming Alley contact me at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  

Blog http://cartooncornerwhyboy.blogspot.com/ 
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cartoon-Corner/198650010208211
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/CartoonCornerWB

Cartoon Corner: Yogi Bear Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Monday, 17 October 2011
in Film Review

For Whyboy's First Halloween Special of the season he continues the tradition of reviewing the most terrifying of all films. A Cartooned Reality. ahhh... ENJOY. 

Yogi Bear is Owned by Warner Bros. 

If you have any requests for a future review or Gaming Alley contact me at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  

Blog http://cartooncornerwhyboy.blogspot.com/ 
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cartoon-Corner/198650010208211
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/CartoonCornerWB 
Jordan Tucker's Deviantart Account http://highinheaven.deviantart.com/

Gaming Alley: Destroy All Humans Parts 1-3

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 11 October 2011
in Video Games

To start off Whyboy's newly named Let's Play series, Gaming Alley, Whyboy takes a look at a truly cheesy game from his childhood and it's all about the loving task of obliterating the Human race. ENJOY

Part 1 - The Invasion Begins

Part 2 - The Same Old Alien Cow Crap 

...

Let's Play Mickey's Magical Mirror Part 11-12

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 02 October 2011
in Video Games

Part 11 - The One That Isn't Interesting

Yeah Mickey almost being killed by the Ghost and Random Crap happening has just become the norm for this game. ENJOY. 

Part 12 - The End? 

Is this Really The End?

...

Cartoon Corner: The Pebble & The Penguin Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Monday, 26 September 2011
in animated movie review

First there was the cutesy throw up that was A Troll in Central Park, then there was the sexist undertone of Thumbelina but now we watch a movie SO bland and cliche that even Don Bluth couldn't live with it. Enjoy the third trip into Don Bluth's 90s hell. ENJOY.

The Pebble & The Penguin is owned by MGM

Title Card by Jordan W. Tucker also known as HighinHeaven on Deviantart: http://highinheaven.deviantart.com/

...

Let's Play Mickey's Magical Mirror Part 8 - Mickey Learns about The Fish & The Bees

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 21 September 2011
in Video Games

Sorry everyone I accidentally forgot to post part 8 before I posted part 9 and 10. But you'll forgive me after you witness the filthiest and degrading scenes known to video gamedom when Mickey learns about the Fish and The Bees. ENJOY

CARTOON CORNER YOUTUBE CHANNEL: http://www.youtube.com/user/TaylorwyattWhyboy/

CARTOON CORNER BLIP.TV CHANNEL: http://blip.tv/cartooncorner/

CARTOON CORNER BLOG: http://cartooncornerwhyboy.blogspot.com/

...

Let's Play Mickey's Magical Mirror Part 9 - Guitar Hero Mickey

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 18 September 2011
in Video Games

In this installment of Whyboy's Let's Play of Mickey's Magical Mirror possibly the best part of the game is played. PERIOD. And Mickey also gets poked in the ass by a glove but that's not as awesome.

If you have any requests for a future Let's Play or review contact me at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Cartoon Corner: Thumbelina Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Friday, 16 September 2011
in animated movie review

Let's Play Mickey's Magical Mirror Part 5-7

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 06 September 2011
in Video Games

Part 5 - The One with All The Backtracking


Part 6 - The Ghost Gets Serious Ursula Jump Scare


Part 7 - See Scooby-Doo From The Clock Tower

...

Cartoon Corner: Marmaduke Review

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 25 August 2011
in Video Reviews

Let's Play Mickey's Magical Mirror Part 1-4

Posted by Whyboy
Whyboy
I am a creative writer who has decided to become a reviewer. But not just any re
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 25 August 2011
in Video Games

Part 1 - A Magical Adventure Begins

Part 2 - Confusion & Death on The Crazy Train

Part 3 - Pointlessness on The Crazy Train

...