Blogs

TGWTG's Community Blogs.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that has been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login

Why it's Underrated - Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Posted by on in Movies
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 515
  • 2 Comments

Greetings everyone, this is the Reckoning Reviewer here, and once again, I am going over an unappreciated movie. This time it is none other than Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. When this movie came out there were both positive and negative reactions, and mostly confused about the content of the movie. The most negative one I've seen, is a reaction that I absolutely hate in which Brad Jones and his fellow tools say random words that make no sense, and make me want to Falcon Punch him in the face. The only one who I liked in that scene was the robot. Mostly because he was the only one who wasn't an asshole. But why I could make this blog about how much I despise Brad Jones, I have a movie to defend. Now let's start with reasons why people don't like it.

Why people dislike it:

Nuking the Fridge:

Okay, this is a rather funny one. It has had jokes pointed at it again and again. It even has its own meme. It all started with this scene where for some reason a nuclear explosion was about to happen. To survive it, Indiana Jones goes into a refrigerator. There has been controversy as to whether or not he could actually survive this. Even if the fridge could survive the explosion, it's more than possible that Indiana's bones would've all been broken because of the hard landings. I don't care about the laws of physics, I just find it really interesting, and kind of funny that it's a meme. And Steven Spielberg himself defended George Lucas from fans and admitted that it was his idea. Well he did come up with ET, so we can believe the weirdness. Plus, doesn't Indiana Jones survive impossible stunts anyway? Remember the floating raft from Temple of Doom? How about the tank scene from Last Crusade? Anyway, this is nothing new.

Aliens:

Now this film has aliens in it. We can believe that, George Lucas and Steven Spielberg are both like gods when it comes to aliens in movies. I don't know why people are so pissed about aliens, but I guess it's something like this. The first three Indiana Jones movies had some religion in them, and I never really understood those religions, and fans consider aliens more sci-fi than religious. I'm sure aliens have their own religions too, so it counts. If you think aliens are too unreal for Indiana Jones, let me remind you that there was always some dark magic in the first three movies. You call THAT realistic?! But seriously, I don't mind the aliens, they're better than those dudes in Temple of Doom.

Some of the Animals in the Movie:

I have no idea who started this, but it is just a ridiculous thing to talk about. Don't accuse me for making something up, I'm just going by what people have been saying they don't like. Okay, it's a very stupid thing to talk about. There were prairie dogs, monkeys, killer ants. I think it's because most of the animals were in CGI, or they had something goofy about them. I think this is just a little thing, nothing to be concerned about. I would've liked to see a big lipped alligator in the movie, but didn't get my wish. Why am I even talking about the prairie dogs and monkeys? This is messed up! I'm going to stop NOW!

Okay, I went into strange territory for a second. Seriously, there must be some really stupid people out there to think that prairie dogs and monkeys are a bad thing in movies. But now that I got those psychopaths out of the way, let me talk about why I like it.

Why I like it:

I seriously do like the Indiana Jones movies (except for Temple of Doom, that one sucks), and I thought that this one really did capture the old feeling of the adventure from the original films. Harrison Ford is still great, and I like Shia LaBeouf who was also in the Transformers movies. I guess some people might say I'm too nice, but seriously, I bashed the Cinema Snob at the beginning, I'm not always so happy. But seriously, give the film a chance, it's just like the other Indiana Jones movies except with old jokes and...nuking the fridge.

Okay, now I think I'm going to review Wolverine next week.

The collab was awesome! Mischief and I are a great team! Stay tuned for a review of Avengers Earth's Mightiest Heroes soon.

Comments

  • Fervidor
    Fervidor Tuesday, 22 January 2013

    Personally, I think Crystal Skull is an excellent Indiana Jones movie. I mean, it's not Last Crusade, but only Last Crusade is Last Crusade so that doesn't count.

    The aliens were a deliberate stylistic decision that makes perfect sense - Indiana jones has always been about pulp adventure, and the original movies are set in the 30s and are based on the supernaturally-flavored adventure stories of that time. Crystal Skull on the other hand is set in the 50s at which point aliens were all the rage.

    I think that if anything, that's the strenght of Crystal Skull: It allowed its hero to age, and it allowed the zeitgeist of his world to age with him. But at the same time, it is undeniably an Indiana Jones movie. That's sort of the theme of the movie: Some things change, some things remain the same.

    Nuking the fridge? That was obviously a spoof on the old advice that one could survive radioactive fallout by hiding in a refridgerator. (Which made some sense at the time because old timey fridges where lined with led.) Sure, surviving an actual nuclear explosion is absurdly over the top, but so was the raft scene in Temple of Doom. It's Indiana Jones, it's supposed to be kinda silly at times.

  • NormalScabs
    NormalScabs Wednesday, 23 January 2013

    No, this movie was bad. I liked how you chose to argue against the internet's ineptitude instead of legitimate criticisms of the film. The "Nuking the fridge" didn't exactly work and was a bit silly but it was fine, but the crystal skull would have worked if it was clear what the purpose of obtaining it was. No one watching this film cared about whether the Russians were able to get the skull because it was shown not to work (whatever the purpose of it was.) Compare that to the Ark. That was simple enough and the audience understood and therefore was able to care what was going on. Using aliens in of itself isn't bad (not necessarily bright however,) but it could have worked. But it didn't because there was no reason why the viewer should care at all about the skull. However, the internet got it right complaining about the CGI in this film. It was godawful and goofy-looking and didn't work for the aesthetic of an Indiana Jones film.

    Harrison Ford was fine, but one has to realize that Indiana Jones is supposed to be cool, not some old guy. Maybe if they played around with the typical themes of mortality it could have worked, but they attempted to make an old-fashioned Indiana Jones film and it doesn't work because the archetype isn't fulfilled by Harrison Ford's 70 year-old frame.

    But the question remains. Why even defend this film? It's not that bad, sure but is it really worth the energy (or lack thereof)? I mean Indiana Jones isn't exactly high art. I personally don't care for them but I at least recognize what makes them good in their own way. But that doesn't mean it's worth such a debate or the anger against Brad Jones (whose review of it I haven't seen nor don't care about.) But if you're going to go about doing this then you REALLY need to back up your argument because this movie by any standard is terrible and any attempt to justify it requires something profound in order to prove everything wrong, not just provide a weak rebuttal against mindless internet users. You can like the film of course, which I guess is what your argument came down to.

  • Please login first in order for you to submit comments

Blog Categories