Blogs

TGWTG's Community Blogs.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that has been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login

Should this offend you?

Posted by on in Thoughts
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 392
  • 4 Comments

In the words of Stephen Fry- “I find that offensive, that phrase has no meaning, it has no purpose, it has no reason to be respected as a phrase.” I am offended by that. “Well, so fucking what?”

Offensive media, in certain contexts shouldn't be pulled because some people find it offensive. If it is in a context in which it is not taken to be a factual representation of an event or group then I think it's safe to say that it shouldn't matter what is being said. I understand being pissed off if the news portrays a group or event unjustly, then that's fair enough.

Like, what might be being said might be shit or unfunny, but who cares. With TV especially like if you don't like a programme and you find it offensive then there's this really cool new solution I figured out. Change the channel. Being offended by something on television is similar to somebody with nut allergies entering a peanut butter factory, they know there's a risk and if they start feeling repulsed by what's around them they can simply leave.

“I want to live in a liberal society with the right to free speech, but don't want to ever be offended again.” - Well then you're a fucking idiot.

Maybe I should try to understand this from a psychological perspective. Perhaps it's a narcissistic compulsion to demonstrate how much more thoughtful and sensitive you are than the ignorant ass who offended you? An earnest belief that a better world will only be reached after several thousand hours of angry dissent over absolutely every linguistic transgression ever made?  A cathartic howl of vague personal unhappiness disguised as a campaign of improvement? Or maybe just something for them to do between bowel movements?

Some people feel obliged to immediately run around honking on about how offended they are, as though this is some kind of devastating eureka moment that absolutely must be shared with the rest of humanity. It isn't. Fuck off, please.

As Frankie Boyle (a comedian) once said, “I like offending idiots, I like being hated by morons. I like the idea that there is a line of people that are waiting to dance on my grave and if I get buried at sea they'll all fucking drown.”

Often I find that people get offended on behalf of other people, now I very much do appreciate people's empathy for others feelings so thanks for that. But unless you are made uncomfortable or angry by what is being displayed then you don't find it offensive. So being offended on somebody's behalf is quite ridiculous. 

Maybe I have more faith in humanity than these people because I tend to believe that if for example a stereotype is being portrayed in a Hollywood film, that the majority of people won't go outside with a completely new perspective on the group that's being stereotyped... unless they're a bit ignorant, in which case I would feel bad for them and wish to educate them.

I don't think the majority of people with a brain stem left the cinema thinking, “well thanks to Aladdin I have a completely new and factual perspective on Arab people.” Even if that is the case and they later on that day they do make a stupid assumption, I would believe that somebody civil could argue back, correct them and move on.

Comments

  • itstheblueguy
    itstheblueguy Saturday, 26 January 2013

    Is this another shill for that Brickleberry show? :D

    In all seriousness, it sort of depends on what you're referring to. On the end of whoever was offended, it's one thing if they want to censor it, but it's another if they're just firing back their opinion, which you can't really blame anyone for doing. If someone walks up to you and starts saying disgusting things about your mom, yes, the good, optimal reactions are to be tactful or walk away, but the instinctual reaction is to punch them in the face, which they either should have known or did. Entertainers can think whatever they want about themselves or their material, but their job revolves around their audience; one portion of the viewers can't tell the other what they can or can't enjoy, but it's not bad to represent those who think the material does everyone a disservice, throwing that into the ring for consideration.

    From the other end, if you're crossing a line to create something "edgy," sure, go ahead if you really think you've got something (and are willing to risk making people want to hit you). But if you're being amoral, and only because you don't care, there's no reason for people to accept it. The worry with stereotypes isn't that they're going to somehow reeducate the population on what's PC; it's just a matter of respect. Movies and shows have a pretty wide circle of people for whom they set an example, and presenting ignorant disrespect based on race as acceptable plays against the standards people have worked towards since forever. Some things are either common decency or aren't.

  • ODriscoll
    ODriscoll Saturday, 26 January 2013

    I completely agree with you, and I in no way believe that the other side shouldn't comeback with a retort. I probably should have made it clearer though, in this blog that I was trying to make a point about unnecessary censorship. I just believe that we are at a point now in society where the majority of people are reasonable and can understand if somebody is trying to be edgy or if they are being amoral. In regards to people being amoral I bring you back to the point about people being reasonable, for example if there was a show in which there was a comedian who was making jokes in very poor taste, I tend to think that people would realise so they would not be entertained, therefore he would get low ratings and would probably be taken off air anyway. I was just trying to compare how censorship can devalue human understanding and rationality about certain materials.
    Personally, I wouldn't want to say something typically offensive because I find typically offensive things uncomfortable as they tend to offend me as well.

  • Skyscraper
    Skyscraper Sunday, 27 January 2013

    Perhaps I'm not reading this right, but I'm kinda getting the vibe that this article seems to say that people should complain less when someone says something stupid, because the person saying something stupid is probably going to get some kind of come-uppance sooner or later?

    Which I understand to a certain extent- the internet can sometimes go completely off the walls with it's echo chamber mentality, where in a very short span of time a certain opinion can be presented as fact and repeated so much that it just derails all conversation and creates real, lasting harm. But on the other hand, being apathic to people acting like douchebags is really a pretty terrible idea, because people NEED to be called on bullshit in order to be shamed/convinced to cut said bullshit out. It's a balancing act between when one should speak and when to hold their peace, but it just feels like this article is telling people to be apathetic.

  • ODriscoll
    ODriscoll Monday, 28 January 2013

    Yeah, looking back now on the article I guess the tone is easy to be misread (I need to practice my writing). I should say, I completely encourage criticism of a view, whether that view is offensive or not because it is only through criticism and scruteny that we will be able to reach an intelligable conclusion that deserves to respected and defended.
    I do not think that the resolution to unecessary censorship of an "offensive" view is to censor a counter argument. People are of course aloud to be offended, what I take issue with is when somebody's view causes censorship of certain material. Because when there is something on TV that is offensive I think it is important to allow it to exist, as it can spark discussion between people in which intelligent arguments and conclusion will be eventually made (because people aren't stupid and it's much harder to defend a stupid and offensive view). I do agree with your point though, about how an opinion can be repeated as fact and cause harm, that's why I believe context is very important in regards to whether something should be pulled or not.

  • Please login first in order for you to submit comments

Blog Categories