Daffy's Halloween Fright Fest Episode 8: Halloween Nightmare Double Review

Posted by: Daffy in Movie ReviewsMovie remakesHorrorHalloween on Print PDF

Daffy

This is a double review of two classic horror flicks. Let's get started.

Jason has his hockey mask. Freddy has his quick wit. Leatherface has his chainsaw. But, there is one guy who stands out beyond the rest. He's my favorite serial killer. He's the one in the movie whose name is the current holiday. I'm talking about Michael Myers and the classic horror movie ‘Halloween.'

You know the drill. IMDb summary:

"The year is 1963, the night; Halloween. Police are called to 43 Lampkin Ln. only to discover that a 17 year Judith Myers had been stabbed to death, by her 6 year-old brother... After being institutionalized for 15 years, Myers breaks out just days before Halloween. No one knows nor would wish to find out what would happen on October 31st 1978, besides Myer's physciatrist Dr. Loomis. He knows Michael is coming back to Haddonfield, but by the time the town realizes it, it'll be to late for many people..."

This is one of the few classic killer horror movies that is scary without being completely gory. It's got a bunch of false build-ups, sudden pop-ups, and it builds up the suspense in the killing part the perfect amount. Who do we have to thank for all this?

First, we have to give major credit to John Carpenter, the writer and director. He has given us other classics, such as the rest of the Halloween series, The Fog, They Live!, and a bunch of others. He's a sick and twisted. He knows how to make a really weird film. He's a horror genius.

Next, a bunch of credit goes to the composer who made the classic theme of Halloween. He made the perfect music to go with this. Though, in my opinion, they over use it just a bit. But, there's no blaming the guy who wrote it. Great job... whoever you are.

Finally, we should thank whoever it is behind the mask. The guy who wears that white William Shatner mask shows the best bodily emotion I've ever seen in a horror movie killer. You can tell exactly when he's pissed, content, patient, and everything else.

It's my favorite horror movie. And since I basically thought it was perfect as it is, I will never see the remake. It loses point just because of that remake.

I give it 9 pumpkins with bloody knives out of 10.

 

For years and years I was afraid of this next movie. I saw only a few minutes of it when I was 8 or 9 and I wasn't able to see it for the next 8 or 9 years. But, this year, I saw it was going to be on TV. I figured that the best way to watch it was to be on TV since most of the gore would be edited out. So, this year, I finally face my fears and saw... Nightmare on Elm Street.

I turned on the channel maybe 15 minutes late, but I got the gist of the movie. And here's the summary from IMDb:

"Freddy Kruger is the substance of nightmares. He always appears strangely dressed and has knives on the fingers of his right hand. A group of four teenagers all begin to have the same strange dreams about Freddy and then one of them is gruesomely murdered in her sleep. The survivors soon realize that if Freddy kills them in their sleep, then they will die in real life too. Thus begins an ordeal of wakefulness as they try to find some way to stop Freddy."

Well, I have no idea why I was so terrified of this movie. Sure, it's scary. But, no more so than any other serial killer flick I've seen. Although, it does have some strange moments, creepy scenes, a creepy theme song sung by little girls, and a surprising ending. All in all, I think it's a pretty creative idea.

The director of this movie is, yep, Wes Craven. If John Carpenter is a horror genius, Wes Craven is a horror GOD. He has probably the freakiest ideas I've ever heard of. He's given us other such classics as Scream, The Hills have Eyes, and Red Eye. He just might be one of the freakiest horror writers I've ever heard of.

Robert Englund is probably the best guy they could have gotten to play Freddy. He has the perfect mannerisms, a creepy voice, and a great sense of humor. Nobody else could have pulled all that off.

All in all, this film is better then I remembered it to be. Of course, I might be biased since I've only seen the ‘made-for-TV' version. It's a pretty decent scary movie.

I'm giving it 8 knived gloves out of 10.

Now, I'm going to go and make sure I stay awake for the rest of my life...

 

 

Does anyone know where I can get a lifetime supply of Stay Awake pills?

Comments (8)add
2204
...
written by ScottishInsomnia , October 26, 2008
I don't know what it is with this review, it feels quite empty to be brutally honest. You're cutting and pasting the blurb from IMDb then giving us a few general sentances which I feel don't really add to what anybody who has heard of the movie already knows. All I can take from this review is that these 2 movies are horror movies, a list of other movies done by the directors of both of them and that the actors that played the killers were good.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
2596
...
written by JinLee86 , October 26, 2008
To Scottish, I accidentally voted down on your comment. I didn't mean to.

While I enjoy horror films, they're not my favorite genre. That's not to say I don't know what they are or anything like that. Halloween is EASILY my favorite horror movie with Nightmare on Elm St. being a close second. So this was a double-whammy for me. Thank you!
The music was just awesome and fit with the franchise. It was spot-on perfect. That's not to say the movie itself was perfect. I mean c'mon, the three women you see in present day are just laughably bad. One looks and sounds like 35-year-old, one's a slut (a reoccurring character in horror films), and the other just sounds incredibly bad. It's like she was mocking the movie with her terrible acting.
Aside from that, there's very little to say about it in terms of "wthell?" It's a great movie, one of my favorites, and definitely a 10/10 in terms of slasher flicks. Some of the sequels were just bad, though.
You really should give the 2007 version a try. It is a remake, but it's also a prequel. Rob Zombie himself stated that there's no way you can remake Halloween and get the same magic the original had, so instead of completely remaking it, he threw in portions to make it more of a prequel.

Nightmare on Elm St. used to scare the crap out of me! Then I watched my sister's VHS (keeping the gore and stuff in) and actually enjoyed it. I don't think there's anything scarier than being killed when you're asleep. After all, if you're a heavy sleeper (like I am), and don't hear footsteps or anything coming into your house and you don't wake up in time, you're fucked. You're more invulnerable while asleep than a newborn is while awake... that's bad.
Freddy Kruger is probably the best serial killer, because not only does he kill you in your sleep, but he's also witty and has a personality. He's not afraid to show his face because he knows that there's no way for the police or anyone else to stop him (or he thought this). It wasn't until Freddy vs. Jason that we learn how Elm St. defeated Freddy (by stopping everyone from dreaming, locking them up, and plenty of pills).
It's creative, it's unique, it allows a window for anything to happen, and it's probably one of the scariest thoughts on the planet.

Any more Stay Awake's Daffy?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
147
...
written by Daffy , October 26, 2008
To Scottie: Yeah, I can see what you mean. But, I didn't go into too much detail on either film for a reason. I didn't want to make this thing too long. Most of the time, if I make the review too long, nobody bothers to read it. (Hell, sometimes I don't read a review because it looks too long.) But, maybe I should have taken at least a little more time. Thank you for your input. I'll try to do better next time.

To JinLeee: Yeah, I know what you mean about those three girls. They were pretty bad. (Except for Jamie Lee Curtis. I liked her in this.) I don't know about watching the 2007 version. Maybe.... I just don't want to be disappointed if they add too much gore or use too much CGI. I'll see if I will watch it.
And, no, I still haven't been able to find any Stay Awakes. smilies/cheesy.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
2596
...
written by JinLee86 , October 26, 2008
Oh, don't expect it to be as great as the original. In fact, I'll dare say not to go into the movie expecting TOO much. It's ok as a prequel, but not absolutely terrible.

Jamie Lee Curtis was fine after a while, but she seemed more like an unwed, childless woman than a schoolgirl.
I say try to find someone who can let you borrow the DVD or something.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
844
...
written by SuperSonicGoku , October 27, 2008
*Whispers* Go to the drug store in new york by the empire state building. They have a plan for lifetime supply of sleeping pills. *Stops whispering*
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
7179
9...10...never sleep again...
written by Shadowdancer21b , October 27, 2008
The Nightmare on Elm Street movies affected my youth in profound ways. The movies had recurring themes of coming of age in a world gone mad, where your parents actually harm you most of the time through doing things "for your own good". Many strong female leads were present, defying the preavling stereotypes of the genre. Also, Roobert Englund's performance was superb in the manner of his theatrical movements as well as dialogue delivery. His backround as a Shakespearean actor truly shows. Freddy Kreuger himself was an embodiment of everything that as a child in the 80s I had been taught to fear. He was a kidnapper and child molester/murderer, he WAS the boogeyman incarnate. His ability to get you in your dreams, where you were by yourself, cut off from the protection of your family was also quite terrifying. As an adult, I can enjoy the simplicity of the storytelling and the powerful imagery and cinematography, but as a child, all I felt was a dread expectation of Freddy's inevitable appearance. Freddy Kreuger was my personal boogeyman; I would see him lurking in the shadows and hiding in shadowed trees.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
6374
Sorry Daffy...
written by SimonW , October 27, 2008
Sorry I had not replied sooner, needed to upload my own stuff.

Ah, Halloween and A Nightmare On Elm Street, I remember these two movies well. I was more of a Freddy fan then a Jason fan but I think Jason held his own.

Sorry if my reply is not as lengthy as others but I say what only needs to be said. As for the sleeping tablets, take some from an old relative. smilies/smiley.gif

Nice review(s) as always Daffy. smilies/grin.gif

SimonW.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
3716
nice
written by lil_mizz_krazie , October 29, 2008
very nice review. i've never seen any of these movies...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy